14 Mar
2014
14 Mar
'14
12:05 p.m.
If my compiler has a flag for -fdisable-long-double-complex, we're good, right? Jeff Sent from my iPhone On Mar 14, 2014, at 11:54 AM, "Underwood, Keith D" <[email protected]> wrote:
2. Now we expect every system to have the equivalent of CMPXCHG16B and that basic types will never be longer than 16B (unless a longer atomic is made available)?
You mean... like long double complex?