No comments; its fine for me. The other references are for Fortran, where a special Fortran version of MPI_WIN_SHARED_QUERY has to be supported or not supported since "baseptr" is returned by MPI_WIN_SHARED_QUERY. Hubert ________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of William Gropp [[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 10:07 AM To: MPI 3.0 Remote Memory Access working group Subject: [Mpi3-rma] Fwd: [Mpi-comments] MPI_WIN_SHARED_QUERY I propose a slightly different version: IN rank rank in the group of window win (non-negative integer) or MPI_PROC_NULL (basically, adding "or MPI_PROC_NULL" at the end. The other is in Chapter 17 (but on p 614, line 9 in the version I'm looking at). Comments? Bill William Gropp Director, Parallel Computing Institute Deputy Director for Research Institute for Advanced Computing Applications and Technologies Paul and Cynthia Saylor Professor of Computer Science University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Begin forwarded message: From: Hubert Ritzdorf <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [Mpi-comments] MPI_WIN_SHARED_QUERY Date: September 4, 2012 5:12:02 PM GMT+02:00 To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: Comments on the MPI Standard <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Hi, Page 410, Line 26 should be IN rank rank in the group of window win or MPI_PROC_NULL A reference to MPI_WIN_SHARED_QUERY is missing on Page 612, Line 1 (Fortran support) and Page 614, Line 9 and Line 31. Hubert _______________________________________________ mpi-comments mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-comments Click here<https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/vydAV7chOHXTndxI!oX7UspzDoGhQe72iWyDn0zK5YMqbSK7WQ0Cw6WaEYy6UgrRW0dCiGa!C8s28mHCioHNDQ==> to report this email as spam.