Ok. If there are just a few of us, we don't need to schedule a working
group session.
~Jim.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:52 AM, Rajeev Thakur <thakur(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> It would be good for those who will be there to discuss the issues in
> Rolf's ticket 456 (https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/456)
> Only 3 people from the RMA working group will be there I think.
>
> Rajeev
>
>
> On Sep 2, 2014, at 4:48 PM, Schulz Martin <schulzm(a)llnl.gov> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jim,
> >
> > Meeting in parallel with tools is certainly fine – however, when I asked
> the WG chairs (in this case Bill and Rajeev), the feeling was that there
> would not be enough RMA people present for this to make sense.
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > Martin Schulz, schulzm(a)llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/
> > CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA
> >
> >
> > From: Jim Dinan <james.dinan(a)gmail.com>
> > Reply-To: MPI WG Remote Memory Access working group <
> mpiwg-rma(a)lists.mpi-forum.org>
> > Date: Tuesday, September 2, 2014 at 2:31 PM
> > To: MPI WG Remote Memory Access working group <
> mpiwg-rma(a)lists.mpi-forum.org>
> > Subject: [mpiwg-rma] WG Meeting in Japan
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Should we request working group time at the upcoming meeting? If RMA WG
> members are available during the Monday tools meeting, we could meet in
> parallel. Apart from that, the schedule looks pretty packed.
> >
> > Best,
> > ~Jim.
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpiwg-rma mailing list
> > mpiwg-rma(a)lists.mpi-forum.org
> > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-rma
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpiwg-rma mailing list
> mpiwg-rma(a)lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-rma
>
It would be good for those who will be there to discuss the issues in Rolf's ticket 456 (https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/456) Only 3 people from the RMA working group will be there I think.
Rajeev
On Sep 2, 2014, at 4:48 PM, Schulz Martin <schulzm(a)llnl.gov> wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Meeting in parallel with tools is certainly fine – however, when I asked the WG chairs (in this case Bill and Rajeev), the feeling was that there would not be enough RMA people present for this to make sense.
>
> Martin
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Martin Schulz, schulzm(a)llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/
> CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA
>
>
> From: Jim Dinan <james.dinan(a)gmail.com>
> Reply-To: MPI WG Remote Memory Access working group <mpiwg-rma(a)lists.mpi-forum.org>
> Date: Tuesday, September 2, 2014 at 2:31 PM
> To: MPI WG Remote Memory Access working group <mpiwg-rma(a)lists.mpi-forum.org>
> Subject: [mpiwg-rma] WG Meeting in Japan
>
> Hi All,
>
> Should we request working group time at the upcoming meeting? If RMA WG members are available during the Monday tools meeting, we could meet in parallel. Apart from that, the schedule looks pretty packed.
>
> Best,
> ~Jim.
> _______________________________________________
> mpiwg-rma mailing list
> mpiwg-rma(a)lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-rma
Hi Jim,
Meeting in parallel with tools is certainly fine however, when I asked the
WG chairs (in this case Bill and Rajeev), the feeling was that there would
not be enough RMA people present for this to make sense.
Martin
________________________________________________________________________
Martin Schulz, schulzm(a)llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/
CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA
From: Jim Dinan <james.dinan(a)gmail.com>
Reply-To: MPI WG Remote Memory Access working group
<mpiwg-rma(a)lists.mpi-forum.org>
Date: Tuesday, September 2, 2014 at 2:31 PM
To: MPI WG Remote Memory Access working group
<mpiwg-rma(a)lists.mpi-forum.org>
Subject: [mpiwg-rma] WG Meeting in Japan
Hi All,
Should we request working group time at the upcoming meeting? If RMA WG
members are available during the Monday tools meeting, we could meet in
parallel. Apart from that, the schedule looks pretty packed.
Best,
~Jim.
Hi All,
Should we request working group time at the upcoming meeting? If RMA WG
members are available during the Monday tools meeting, we could meet in
parallel. Apart from that, the schedule looks pretty packed.
Best,
~Jim.
