Hi Tony, Easier to review if the PR is done relative to the branch that adds partcomm - this PR#3 shows 1 new commit affecting 1 file, rather than 203 commits affecting 8 files. https://github.com/mpiwg-persistence/mpi-standard/pull/3 Don’t delete PR 275, though - that will be needed later for inclusion into canonical MPI. Cheers, Dan. — Dr Daniel Holmes PhD Architect (HPC Research) [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Phone: +44 (0) 131 651 3465 Mobile: +44 (0) 7940 524 088 Address: Room 2.09, Bayes Centre, 47 Potterrow, Central Area, Edinburgh, EH8 9BT — The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336. — On 9 Sep 2020, at 16:39, Skjellum, Anthony via mpiwg-persistence <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi, The following has been created for your review: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/308 Ryan and I have not hashed through it yet. This was made for the whole WG right away to support maximum review as we do further improvements between Ryan and me. There is text, a PR too attached to this: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/275 Thanks, Tony Anthony Skjellum, PhD Professor of Computer Science and Chair of Excellence Director, SimCenter University of Tennessee at Chattanooga (UTC) [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [or [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] cell: 205-807-4968 _______________________________________________ mpiwg-persistence mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-persistence