Hi Tony,

Easier to review if the PR is done relative to the branch that adds partcomm - this PR#3 shows 1 new commit affecting 1 file, rather than 203 commits affecting 8 files.

https://github.com/mpiwg-persistence/mpi-standard/pull/3

Don’t delete PR 275, though - that will be needed later for inclusion into canonical MPI.

Cheers,
Dan.
—
Dr Daniel Holmes PhD
Architect (HPC Research)
d.holmes@epcc.ed.ac.uk
Phone: +44 (0) 131 651 3465
Mobile: +44 (0) 7940 524 088
Address: Room 2.09, Bayes Centre, 47 Potterrow, Central Area, Edinburgh, EH8 9BT
—
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
—

On 9 Sep 2020, at 16:39, Skjellum, Anthony via mpiwg-persistence <mpiwg-persistence@lists.mpi-forum.org> wrote:

Hi, The following has been created for your review:

https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/308

Ryan and I have not hashed through it yet.  This was made for the whole WG right away to support maximum review 
as we do further improvements between Ryan and me.

There is text, a PR too attached to this:

https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/275

Thanks,
Tony


Anthony Skjellum, PhD
Professor of Computer Science and Chair of Excellence
Director, SimCenter
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga (UTC)
cell: 205-807-4968

_______________________________________________
mpiwg-persistence mailing list
mpiwg-persistence@lists.mpi-forum.org
https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-persistence