This really brings up why I asked about doing it more generally. I think this is worth doing, but it should probably be done in a broader context to get much wider discussion about the implications of offering an operating mode that is ordered asynchronous. This may address issues in other areas of the MPI spec. Jay On 5/24/12 3:01 PM, "Rob Latham" <[email protected]> wrote:
See, now you have a list of options, and you show them to someone like Dries and he says either "you forgot about XYZ" or "oh, i see now, all of those are gross"
==rob
-- Rob Latham Mathematics and Computer Science Division Argonne National Lab, IL USA _______________________________________________ MPI3-IO mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-io