Hi Martin, For the hybrid/communicators WG, we want to do readings for #357, #411 and #381. Some of this might need discussion time too, so I think a 2-hour slot will be good (plenary + reading). We don’t need WG time. Cc’ed the WG in case someone feels otherwise. Thanks, — Pavan On 2/12/14, 12:30 AM, "Schulz, Martin" <[email protected]> wrote:
Dear MPI Forum WG leads,
I am in the process of putting together the agenda for the next forum meeting in the next few weeks and will be putting up a first draft in the next few days. To help me with this, please send me the following information for your WG(s):
- Any tickets for readings or votes that the WG wants to bring up? - For readings: how much time would you like reserved for this? - Any additional plenary times for WG topics? - How much WG time would you like? - For the WG time: any major conflicts that I should be aware of?
Thanks!
Martin
________________________________________________________________________ Martin Schulz, [email protected], http://people.llnl.gov/schulzm CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA