I am no the hook to produce a first draft of a document for this. I am planning to do this later in the week, after I finish the 2.1 document reviews I need to do. Rich On 3/3/08 8:45 AM, "Josh Hursey" <[email protected]> wrote:
I'd like to start the discussion on the proposal for "defining communicator state with process loss", or recoverability of MPI state in the presence of process loss.
To start the discussion I am suggesting that folks have a look at the following paper since I think it relates to quite a number of related topics:
Fagg, G., et. al. "Extending the MPI Specification for Process Fault Tolerance on High Performance Computing Systems" http://icl.cs.utk.edu/projectsfiles/ftmpi/pubs/isc2004-FT-MPI.pdf
---- Josh Hursey Graduate Student, Indiana University
_______________________________________________ Mpi3-ft mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-ft