Just a side note. With the small change in the agreement we discussed lately the usage of MPI_COMM_CREATE_GROUP become an option. You might want to amend the slide 12. George. On Dec 4, 2013, at 18:58 , Wesley Bland <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello WG,
As you know, we won’t be pursuing a reading at this meeting in an effort to better explain the proposal and finalize the improvements to the MPI_AGREE function. We will still be holding the plenary however and I’ve been working on the slides for that time. The current plan is to present the plenary in two parts. I’ll be presenting the first part which will include a modified version of the slides that were shown in Madrid. My understanding from talking to numerous people is that there were quite a few questions and misunderstandings at the last meeting and presenting those slides again with some updates would be valuable to address some concerns. I’ve attached the slides that I plan to present to this email (let me know if they get filtered). Everywhere that I’ve made an update or added a new slide, I made a note in the presenter’s notes so take a look and send back any notes you may have. We unfortunately won’t be able to have a con call about these slides before the meeting, but we will have time during the working group time on Monday that we can go over them if people would like to see them.
The second part of the plenary time will be presented by Aurelien. He’ll be giving examples of FT abstractions that could sit on top of the new ULFM mechanisms and how they could be implemented. I imagine more information about those slides will be coming later in the week as he finished them up.
Thanks, Wesley
<2013-12-11 MPI Forum ULFM.pptx>_______________________________________________ mpiwg-ft mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-ft