I'm good with this too. -craig On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Bill Long <[email protected]> wrote:
On Apr 15, 2016, at 12:41 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <[email protected]> wrote:
Re-sending because the reply-to on the original mail was incorrect (i.e., if you replied and didn't hand-edit the reply address, it likely bounced).
On Apr 15, 2016, at 11:57 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) < [email protected]> wrote:
We brought this up forever ago (December 2014), and never progressed the issue (IIRC).
It came up again today in a different context (in the Open MPI community). So I took the liberty of re-creating the issue in the Github MPI Forum system:
https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/51
We still want to move forward with this, right?
I’m in favor.
Cheers, Bill
-- Jeff Squyres [email protected] For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
_______________________________________________ mpiwg-fortran mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-fortran
-- Jeff Squyres [email protected] For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
_______________________________________________ mpiwg-fortran mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-fortran
Bill Long [email protected] Fortran Technical Support & voice: 651-605-9024 Bioinformatics Software Development fax: 651-605-9142 Cray Inc./ Cray Plaza, Suite 210/ 380 Jackson St./ St. Paul, MN 55101
_______________________________________________ mpiwg-fortran mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-fortran