I also can¹t think of a need to intercept this call - I would be OK with option #1 as well. Martin ________________________________________________________________________ Martin Schulz, [email protected], http://scalability.llnl.gov/ CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA On 5/15/14, 1:38 PM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" <[email protected]> wrote:
On May 15, 2014, at 4:17 PM, Marc-Andre Hermanns <[email protected]> wrote:
isn't MPI_SIZEOF also named as a function that is allowed to be implemented as a macro?
Not that I can find -- that's why I'm asking this question...
Also, the call is likely to be so short (in duration) that you'd have a huge overhead in intercepting it.
I would also be ok with proposed solution #1.
Good. Bill Long is, too. :-)
-- Jeff Squyres [email protected] For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
_______________________________________________ mpiwg-tools mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-tools