Re: [Mpi3-bwcompat] MPI Backward Compatibility Working Group
The thought on the call was that Quincey would add text about MPI_Offset (to this new section) when he does the ticket covering more IO things. Do we want to add the text about Offset now? REMINDER: We need to get this done TODAY to qualify for a formal reading at the Forum meeting. I attached section 2.5.8 with the changes I proposed -- **INCLUDING** the rationale section (but without text about Offset). Comments? On Mar 13, 2011, at 2:55 PM, Fab Tillier wrote:
Only open, as far as I can tell, is Rajeev's question about making MPI_Count at least as big as the biggest of {int,MPI_Aint, MPI_Offset}. We've covered the first two, but not MPI_Offset.
-Fab
-- Jeff Squyres jsquyres_at_[hidden] For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ *
participants (1)
-
unknown@example.com