On Mar 14, 2011, at 9:52 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:

The thought on the call was that Quincey would add text about MPI_Offset (to this new section) when he does the ticket covering more IO things.

Yup, I'm still planning to do that. Quincey

Do we want to add the text about Offset now?

REMINDER: We need to get this done TODAY to qualify for a formal reading at the Forum meeting.

I attached section 2.5.8 with the changes I proposed -- **INCLUDING** the rationale section (but without text about Offset).

Comments?

On Mar 13, 2011, at 2:55 PM, Fab Tillier wrote:

...

Only open, as far as I can tell, is Rajeev's question about making MPI_Count at least as big as the biggest of {int,MPI_Aint, MPI_Offset}. We've covered the first two, but not MPI_Offset.

-Fab

-- Jeff Squyres jsquyres_at_[hidden] For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ <section-258-mpi-count.pdf>_______________________________________________ Mpi3-bwcompat mailing list Mpi3-bwcompat_at_[hidden] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-bwcompat