Re: [Mpi3-bwcompat] Notes from ATL Forum meeting
26 Jan
2010
26 Jan
'10
9:38 a.m.
On Jan 26, 2010, at 8:39 AM, Quincey Koziol wrote:
I think we need to pick a "preferred vector" through the name combinations for each version of the standard and use a feature-neutral suffix for the changed routines' names. Either a totally abstract sequential suffix like: (nothing)->2->3->4, or a standard version specific suffix: (nothing)->3->31->32->...->4->41->...
I think the single digits would be fine. We have a precedent of keeping compatibility between minor MPI revs and only breaking compatibility if something is really broken. I.e., if we make MPI_Foo3 and then find out that it's broken, I think the gut reaction of the Forum would be to fix MPI_Foo3, not make MPI_Foo31. -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres_at_[hidden]
6022
Age (days ago)
6022
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
unknown@example.com