I wasn't at the last Forum meeting, so may have missed some of the background. Is ticket #224 obsolete now? If so, you may want to indicate that in 224. Do MPI_Send/Recv etc. remain unchanged, i.e., no MPI_Count in them? If so, why do we need a new MPI_Get_count? Are the new "w" versions of the collectives specifically related to this ticket (i.e. to address the 64-bit count requirement) or are they a separate issue (i.e. a general need for array of datatypes instead of one datatype)? Minor typos: Two of the prototypes for Scatterw say Scatterv instead. Rajeev On Jan 26, 2011, at 3:38 PM, Fab Tillier wrote:
Ok folks, not a whole lot of time before the meeting, so it would be great if we could get everyone to read through the ticket and make sure I didn't miss something. I'd like to have David Solt generate a PDF sometime next week, in time for me to read it at the forum the following week (our time slot for this is 'working lunch' on Tuesday.
https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/265
Thanks for your help, -Fab
_______________________________________________ Mpi3-bwcompat mailing list Mpi3-bwcompat_at_[hidden] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-bwcompat