I believe that is a mistake on my part. Yes, for this proposal I believe the intent is to require it to be 64-bit. I will update. Dave -----Original Message----- From: mpi3-bwcompat-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:mpi3-bwcompat-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Rajeev Thakur Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 12:48 PM To: 'MPI-3 backwards compatability WG' Subject: Re: [Mpi3-bwcompat] Notes from last meeting + draft of standard text So MPI_Count is not required to 64-bit? Rjaeev
-----Original Message----- From: mpi3-bwcompat-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:mpi3-bwcompat-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Solt, David George Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 11:31 AM To: MPI-3 backwards compatability WG Subject: [Mpi3-bwcompat] Notes from last meeting + draft of standard text
I added a few notes to the meeting note page based on our meeting last week. I also put forth a rough draft of our explanation of versioning and an introduction to the MPI_Count concept.
https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/wiki/DraftMpiCountText
I plan to add a presentation of the associated MPI datatype for MPI_Count later this week. Feel free to update, modify, criticize, praise, etc, etc.
I also added a placeholder on the main page for our recommendations to authors, but have not created the link yet. If anyone wants to beat me to it, feel free to have at it. Otherwise I will take a stab at it later in the week.
Thanks, Dave
_______________________________________________ Mpi3-bwcompat mailing list Mpi3-bwcompat_at_[hidden] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-bwcompat
_______________________________________________ Mpi3-bwcompat mailing list Mpi3-bwcompat_at_[hidden] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-bwcompat