11 Apr
2011
11 Apr
'11
4:10 p.m.
Note that there is not much time before the next Forum meeting. To get this in the pre-requisite 2 weeks before the Forum meeting, we have to send around a new document by *Monday, May 25*. Or *exactly 2 weeks from today*. How do we want to make immediate progress on the doc so that we can meet this deadline? On Apr 5, 2011, at 12:12 PM, Solt, David George wrote: >> Page numbers are Acrobat page numbers, not document page numbers. > > Page numbers are random and do not appear to be associated with any document in the known universe :) > >> Page9_at_19: ...count values, and that type is MPI_Count... >> Page9_at_29: confusion about 'type map' applying to memory only, not file view >> Page9_at_30: For backward compatibility, many MPI routines use int in C or INTEGER in Fortran as count arguments. > > Left for next concall > >> Page24_at_9: MPI_COUNT should be MPI_Count > - done >> Page91_at_11: "value of size to" size should be a different font. > - done >> Page92_at_15: Add "The Functions MPI_TYPE_GET_EXTENT" > - done, changed to "The functions MPI_TYPE_GET_EXTENT and ..." > >> Page94_at_33: Start sentence properly, not with 'true_lb' (Ticket0 for Adam) > > Left for Adam since this is not text we changed > >> Page120_at_38: Use similar wording to previous "limits" wording might be better (more consistent) >> Need to mention overflow for MPI_GET_COUNT? One could use MPI_STATUS_SET_ELEMENTS_X to overflow MPI_GET_COUNT. > > Left for next concall > >> In MPI Forum 3.0 draft 1 document: >> Page455_at_32 add MPI_COUNT as width = 8 in external32 > -done > > Thanks, > Dave > > -----Original Message----- > From: mpi3-bwcompat-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:mpi3-bwcompat-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Fab Tillier > Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 10:44 AM > To: MPI-3 backwards compatability WG (mpi3-bwcompat_at_[hidden]) > Subject: [Mpi3-bwcompat] MPI_Count Ticket 265 feedback > > Page numbers are Acrobat page numbers, not document page numbers. > > Page9_at_19: ...count values, and that type is MPI_Count... > Page9_at_29: confusion about 'type map' applying to memory only, not file view > Page9_at_30: For backward compatibility, many MPI routines use int in C or INTEGER in Fortran as count arguments. > Page24_at_9: MPI_COUNT should be MPI_Count > Page91_at_11: "value of size to" size should be a different font. > Page92_at_15: Add "The Functions MPI_TYPE_GET_EXTENT" > Page94_at_33: Start sentence properly, not with 'true_lb' (Ticket0 for Adam) > Page120_at_38: Use similar wording to previous "limits" wording might be better (more consistent) > Need to mention overflow for MPI_GET_COUNT? One could use MPI_STATUS_SET_ELEMENTS_X to overflow MPI_GET_COUNT. > > In MPI Forum 3.0 draft 1 document: > Page455_at_32 add MPI_COUNT as width = 8 in external32 > > _______________________________________________ > Mpi3-bwcompat mailing list > Mpi3-bwcompat_at_[hidden] > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-bwcompat > > _______________________________________________ > Mpi3-bwcompat mailing list > Mpi3-bwcompat_at_[hidden] > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-bwcompat -- Jeff Squyres jsquyres_at_[hidden] For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/