Already caught the misspelling. Regarding slide #3, I don't think there is anything that we can propose that will get met with a lot of love. Right now it is our only idea that we have given serious thought, so we can get additional thoughts on it or not say anything about what we are doing. Did you feel like the feedback was so strong and negative that this general strategy should not be considered further? Dave -----Original Message----- From: mpi3-bwcompat-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:mpi3-bwcompat-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Jeff Squyres Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 4:20 PM To: MPI-3 backwards compatability WG Subject: Re: [Mpi3-bwcompat] slides for BOF Slide 2: acceptable, not acceptible Slide 3: is that really our current idea? I thought the Forum kinda hated it...? On Nov 13, 2009, at 9:09 AM, Solt, David George wrote:
Anyone want to make changes before we hand these over to Rich for next week? Dave
<MPI3_back_compatibility_overview.pptx><ATT4939006.txt>
-- Jeff Squyres jsquyres_at_[hidden] _______________________________________________ Mpi3-bwcompat mailing list Mpi3-bwcompat_at_[hidden] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-bwcompat