On Oct 9, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Richard Graham wrote:

> We will make "final" decisions here in Dec.
> 
>> From my perspective the decision to be made was between the meeting schedule
> - Japan, Chicago, SJ, Chicago (what we voted for)
> And 
> - Japan, Chicago, Madrid,  SJ (with the understanding that meetings in Japan would be every other year)
> 
> That is what came up at the end of the last meeting. 

Understood.  

However, it is worth noting that a very different (organization-based) sentiment has arisen about the March meeting since then.

1. There is fairly negative support for Japan in March.
2. There is unanimous support for Chicago in June.
3. There is clear, overwhelming support for Madrid in September
   --> many prefer a max of 1 non-US meeting per year, and want it to be Madrid/EuroMPI
4. There is strong support for Chicago in December; somewhat less support for San Jose.

-- 
Jeff Squyres
[email protected]
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/