Hi Rusty, Thanks for the feedback and the encouragement - the thanks also have to go to Wesley Bland and Jeff Squyres, though, who in their role as forum secretaries helped write the text and/or have been good sounding boards for these issues! Martin
On 22. Nov 2017, at 04:28, Lusk, Ewing L. <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Martin,
For what it’s worth, I found both of these sensible and well-written. Thanks so much for taking on the extremely important yet thankless role of shepherding the MPI process forward.
Best, Rusty
On Monday,Nov 20, 2017, at 12:12 PM, Martin Schulz <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
Based on the discussions last time on improving the MPI standardization process, Wesley and I have been working on updates to the MPI forum procedures. There are two separate proposals, one on rules for companion documents and one on including virtual meetings. Both will be read and discussed at the upcoming forum meeting and we intend to put them up for a vote if we successfully discuss them.
Both proposals are available from the MPI meeting agenda page:
http://mpi-forum.org/docs/other/procedures-22.pdf http://mpi-forum.org/docs/other/procedures-30.pdf
Thanks!
Martin
_______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpi-forum
_______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpi-forum