We need to make an explicit decision on this. Shall we change the second argument of MPI_Init and MPI_Init_thread to be char *** ? Bill William Gropp Director, Parallel Computing Institute Deputy Director for Research Institute for Advanced Computing Applications and Technologies Paul and Cynthia Saylor Professor of Computer Science University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign On Jul 24, 2012, at 11:42 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Jul 24, 2012, at 12:21 PM, William Gropp wrote:
Clearly, we need to change the prototype for MPI_Init and MPI_Init_thread. The best choice is probably back to the original:
char ***argv_p
since that's what it is (complete with a rationale for why it isn't what we're currently using). I prefer this to the char (*(*(argv_p[]))), ...
Oh the irony!! :-)
-- Jeff Squyres [email protected] For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
_______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum