Pavan and Rich: The standard has been that they get four reviews. The suggestion at the last forum meeting was to reduce the time that these trivial tickets take for voting, etc. I can see a case for reducing the reviewing bruden as well but I think the right solution is: 1. Ticket creators should try to batch trivial changes (this action is not always possible - you want to submit them so you do not forget them); 2. Batch tickets on trivial changes for voting (this may delay voting on some tickets but should not be a big deal as long as they are applied before draft releases). I think we need to maintain the standard of four reviews in order to make the batching of votes safer. Others can look quickly at issues (and reading can just be "Tickets X, Y,...) and assume that reviews have ensured they are reasonable. It does not reduce the review burden but it helps with the overall concern. I have reviewed your ticket. It is clearly correct. Bronis On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Graham, Richard L. wrote:
I think so.
Rich
On 2/20/10 8:07 PM, "Pavan Balaji" <[email protected]> wrote:
Do trivial text changes require 4 reviewers as well?
Here's an example: https://*svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/216
-- Pavan
-- Pavan Balaji http://*www.*mcs.anl.gov/~balaji _______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list [email protected] http://*lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
_______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list [email protected] http://*lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum