Additionally, there were frontmatter changes yesterday on the trunk last night that were made after the branch. Do they need to come over to the branch?
Which branch? What is going on? Do we have a ticket to which we report our chapter PDF reviews?
removed superfluous paragraph after review from Yutaka Ishikawa and Hidejuki Jitsumoto
Yes, it is okay - but it was complicated to make a review about Ticket 109, svn revision 628. For all other chapters: My recommentation is to compare to rev 495 If all changes compared to rev 495 are okay (i.e., do not need any Forum vote, and are clearly marked with Bill's macros) then the chapter is okay. Exceptions, are - Chapters 5, Biblio, and Appendices A.2.3, A.3.3, A3.4.3 and B. Change-Log: here ticket 109 is included - Frontmatter: MPI-3.0 is introduced - all the rest: "no changes" Test: cd chap-xxxx svn diff -r 495:629 | grep '^[++-]' My reviews: 0. chap-frontm - MANY CHANGES --> reviews are necessary Review of .tex and .pdf is needed 1. chap-intro - SEVERAL CHANGES --> reviews are necessary All changes are clearly markuped, i.e., make reviewdoc and reviewing colored mpi-report.pdf should be enough 2. chap-terms - no changes 3. chap-pt2pt - no changes (only a new Latex label) 4. chap-datatypes - no changes 5. chap-coll -->>>>> See ticket 109 for all review-discussions 6. chap-context - no changes 7. chap-topol - no changes 8. chap-inquiry - no changes (only an unused macro is commented out) 9. chap-misc - no changes 10. chap-dynamic - no changes 11. chap-one-side - no changes 12. chap-ei - no changes 13. chap-io - no changes 14. chap-prof - one formatting change: MPI\_SEND --> \mpifunc{MPI\_SEND} 15. chap-deprecated - no changes 16. chap-binding - no changes Should be okay, because ticket 109 has nothing specific to this chapter A.1 chap-appLang - no changes Should be okay, because ticket 109 has nothing specific to this chapter ONE EXCEPTION: 3 times definition of MPI_User_function in A.1.3 see PDF reviews of Ticket 109 B chap-changes - Review is needed Result of my (automated) reviews: Manual reviews are only needed for - Frontmatter - 1 Intro - 5 Coll - 14 Profiling (controling this one change) - A.1.3 due to the reported issues in ticket 109 - B Change-Log Best regards Rolf ----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Squyres" <[email protected]> To: "Main MPI Forum mailing list" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 2:54:15 PM Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Draft standard - take II For example, these changes on the trunk are a little alarming. Who is the collectives chapter chair -- is it Torsten? It is not marked on the web page.
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r618 | htor | 2010-10-24 20:38:04 -0400 (Sun, 24 Oct 2010) | 1 line Changed paths: M /trunk/MPI-3.0/chap-coll/coll.tex
removed superfluous paragraph after review from Yutaka Ishikawa and Hidejuki Jitsumoto ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Whoa -- removed a whole paragraph? Wasn't this text voted on (multiple times)? Maybe removing that specific text is ok, but that log message gives me a little pause, for example...
Additionally, there were frontmatter changes yesterday on the trunk last night that were made after the branch. Do they need to come over to the branch?
On Oct 26, 2010, at 8:47 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Oct 25, 2010, at 9:28 PM, Graham, Richard L. wrote:
Just a friendly reminder that we are trying to get the draft standard out before SC, and were aiming to have people review their sections by mid last week. By my records the only chapters that have passed WG reviews are: - Environment management - Profiling Interface
I am equating 100% WG review == section reviewed.
I'm not sure I understand. Are you looking for an affirmation from every single member of every single WG? I thought that the committee chair reporting back would be enough.
Please make your best effort to complete reviews ASAP, so we can get this out the door.
Which are we reviewing, the trunk or the branch? (I don't think that this has been conveyed to the Forum yet)
Both changed as of yesterday.
-- Jeff Squyres [email protected] For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
_______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
-- Jeff Squyres [email protected] For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
_______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
-- Dr. Rolf Rabenseifner . . . . . . . . . .. email [email protected] High Performance Computing Center (HLRS) . phone ++49(0)711/685-65530 University of Stuttgart . . . . . . . . .. fax ++49(0)711 / 685-65832 Head of Dpmt Parallel Computing . . . www.hlrs.de/people/rabenseifner Nobelstr. 19, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany . (Office: Allmandring 30)