The C++ developers that I know (not many) tend to use the C bindings instead of the C++ bindings or the Boost MPI. Puri ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rolf Rabenseifner" <rabenseifner_at_[hidden]> To: "MPI 2.1 Mailing List" <mpi-21_at_[hidden]> Cc: "Martin Bernreuther" <bernreuther_at_[hidden]> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2008 11:09:09 AM (GMT-0600) America/Chicago Subject: [Mpi-21] Relevance of C++ MPI binding of www.boost.org All C++ MPI specialists, which relevance has the MPI C++ binding of Boost ( http://www.boost.org/ )? In the actual version 1.35 http://www.boost.org/users/news/version_1_35_0 one can find a "C++-friendly interface to the standard Message Passing Interface". The comment from boost: "Although there exist C++ bindings for MPI, they offer little functionality over the C bindings." Is there any knowledge of whether in real C++ programming, whether the official C++ MPI binding or the C++ boost MPI binding is more often used in the C++ community? For me, the answer may have implications on how separate or integrated additional bindings should be integrated into the language independent text of the MPI standard. Best regards Rolf PS: As non-C++-specialist, this question is based on a question from Martin Bernreuther. The citations are from him. Dr. Rolf Rabenseifner . . . . . . . . . .. email rabenseifner_at_[hidden] High Performance Computing Center (HLRS) . phone ++49(0)711/685-65530 University of Stuttgart . . . . . . . . .. fax ++49(0)711 / 685-65832 Head of Dpmt Parallel Computing . . . www.hlrs.de/people/rabenseifner Nobelstr. 19, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany . (Office: Allmandring 30) _______________________________________________ mpi-21 mailing list mpi-21_at_[hidden] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-21