Ray: I think, we should take a closer look at groups who use large allocations and scale them back more severely, or we don't leave Fusion exclusively for industry projects but open it up to everyone. Shashi ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Bair, Raymond A. [[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 4:06 PM To: LCRC Allocations Admins Subject: [allocations-admins] Problem with the revised allocations spreadsheet All of the formulas for sums (row 162) are incorrect. The correct total for column AE (New Decisions) was 34,597,000 not 20,797,000! The value in cell A3 is incorrect. Should be 2015. (Makes no difference since 2014 and 2015 are not leap years.) Most of the industry projects are listed twice, on both the Data page and the Industry page. biodiesel-combustion CAT-engine-modeling cavitation-modeling dual-fuel-sprays LES-Engine LES-sprays We should also move the new project spray-flame-les to Industry (2.85M request). Correct? What should we do now? I have suggestions bsed on past practice. See attached spreadsheet for numbers. Reducing ApsRenewalLattice to 2M, and OPV to 500K. Doing the above changes the total to 27,497,000. Now 26% over-allocated. If we keep the priority 0-2 projects as they are, and scale the rest down to no less than 100K (for the 2nd half), then the scale factor is 71%. See attached spreadsheet. My revised total, percent allocation (relative to 100%), and scale factor are at the bottom of column AE Comments and suggestions? Ray ----------------------------------------- Ray Bair Computing, Environment, and Life Sciences Argonne National Laboratory and the University of Chicago TCS Building 240, Room 4122 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, IL 60439 email: rbair(at)anl.gov Phone: (630)252-5751