May 2015 - Admins - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

Re: [JLSE-Admins] Hardware threading on thing nodes
by Allen, Benjamin S. 07 May '15

07 May '15

Hi Paul, I've disabled HT on thing03 and re-provisioned it with RHEL7. I likely won't have time for a while to get RHEL7 on Dowd. Ben > On May 5, 2015, at 9:20 PM, Paul Romano <promano(a)anl.gov> wrote: > > Hal, > > Thanks for pointing out /opt/at7.0 -- worked great! > > Best, > Paul > > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel(a)anl.gov> wrote: > Hi Paul, Ben, > > I would certainly not object to having a newer base OS on dowd, although we currently do have some newer compilers installed. There are newer compilers installed in: > /opt/at7.0/bin/ > > and you can also use the one in my home directory: > /home/hfinkel/install/ppc64/gcc/bin > > Turning off HT for a few days is fine by me. Please let me know when you're doing it, so that I won't disturb your benchmarks. > > -Hal > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Paul Romano" <paul.k.romano(a)gmail.com> > > To: "Benjamin S. Allen" <bsallen(a)alcf.anl.gov> > > Cc: admins(a)jlse.anl.gov, "Hal J. Finkel" <hfinkel(a)anl.gov> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2015 10:20:27 AM > > Subject: Re: [JLSE-Admins] Hardware threading on thing nodes > > > > > > Thanks Ben. RHEL6 or 7 are fine, so whatever is easiest. GCC 4.8.2 > > would be sufficient for my needs on dowd. > > > > > > Paul > > > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Allen, Benjamin S. < > > bsallen(a)alcf.anl.gov > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Paul, > > > > Yea its possible get a thing node with HT disabled. I'll likely grab > > thing03 for this. Hopefully I'll find some time today to change the > > BIOS setting. Do you want RHEL6 or 7 on the box? > > > > We don't have XL licenses unfortunately. If there's a newer version > > on IBM's website I can re-install the eval and get another 90 days > > out of it. > > > > We can also look at installing RHEL7 on the box, which has GCC 4.8.2. > > Hal Finkel (cc'ed) is the primary user of Dowd, so he'll need to > > weigh in on what we should do. > > > > Ben > > > > > > > > > > > On May 4, 2015, at 10:25 PM, Paul Romano < paul.k.romano(a)gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Ben, > > > > > > Just wanted to ping you on this. Do you think it will be possible > > > to get a thing node with HT disabled for a day or two? > > > > > > Also, an unrelated question -- I saw there is an IBM XL compiler on > > > dowd, but it does not have a valid license. Is there another > > > compiler that works on that node? I need something a little more > > > recent than the default gcc 4.4. I've tried unsuccessfully to > > > build a more recent version of gcc. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Paul > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Paul Romano < > > > paul.k.romano(a)gmail.com > wrote: > > > Hi Ben, > > > > > > One aspect of the study I'm performing is to look at any potential > > > differences between the situation you just described, i.e. only > > > using as many threads as there are physical cores with HT enabled, > > > and actually disabling HT altogether, so unfortunately binding to > > > the first hardware thread won't suffice. Once I have everything > > > scripted and ready to go, it shouldn't take more than a day or two > > > to perform the actual runs. > > > > > > Best, > > > Paul > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Allen, Benjamin S. < > > > bsallen(a)alcf.anl.gov > wrote: > > > Hi Paul, > > > > > > Will running your application with taskset or numactl suffice, eg: > > > taskset -c 0-35 cmd or numactl -C 0-35 cmd? Thus pinning the > > > application to the first hardware thread on each core. > > > > > > If not how long do you think you'll need a machine with HT > > > disabled? > > > > > > Ben > > > > > > > On Apr 25, 2015, at 7:31 AM, Paul Romano < promano(a)anl.gov > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I'm currently doing some studies on the impact of hardware > > > > threading on code performance for nuclear reactor neutronic > > > > calculations. I was wondering if it might be possible to have > > > > one of the thing nodes configured with hardware threading > > > > disabled for the sake of running comparisons. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Paul > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Admins mailing list > > > > Admins(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov > > > > https://lists.jlse.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/admins > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Hal Finkel > Assistant Computational Scientist > Leadership Computing Facility > Argonne National Laboratory >

1 0

Re: [JLSE-Admins] Hardware threading on thing nodes
by Paul Romano 05 May '15

05 May '15

Hal, Thanks for pointing out /opt/at7.0 -- worked great! Best, Paul On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel(a)anl.gov> wrote: > Hi Paul, Ben, > > I would certainly not object to having a newer base OS on dowd, although > we currently do have some newer compilers installed. There are newer > compilers installed in: > /opt/at7.0/bin/ > > and you can also use the one in my home directory: > /home/hfinkel/install/ppc64/gcc/bin > > Turning off HT for a few days is fine by me. Please let me know when > you're doing it, so that I won't disturb your benchmarks. > > -Hal > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Paul Romano" <paul.k.romano(a)gmail.com> > > To: "Benjamin S. Allen" <bsallen(a)alcf.anl.gov> > > Cc: admins(a)jlse.anl.gov, "Hal J. Finkel" <hfinkel(a)anl.gov> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2015 10:20:27 AM > > Subject: Re: [JLSE-Admins] Hardware threading on thing nodes > > > > > > Thanks Ben. RHEL6 or 7 are fine, so whatever is easiest. GCC 4.8.2 > > would be sufficient for my needs on dowd. > > > > > > Paul > > > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Allen, Benjamin S. < > > bsallen(a)alcf.anl.gov > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Paul, > > > > Yea its possible get a thing node with HT disabled. I'll likely grab > > thing03 for this. Hopefully I'll find some time today to change the > > BIOS setting. Do you want RHEL6 or 7 on the box? > > > > We don't have XL licenses unfortunately. If there's a newer version > > on IBM's website I can re-install the eval and get another 90 days > > out of it. > > > > We can also look at installing RHEL7 on the box, which has GCC 4.8.2. > > Hal Finkel (cc'ed) is the primary user of Dowd, so he'll need to > > weigh in on what we should do. > > > > Ben > > > > > > > > > > > On May 4, 2015, at 10:25 PM, Paul Romano < paul.k.romano(a)gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Ben, > > > > > > Just wanted to ping you on this. Do you think it will be possible > > > to get a thing node with HT disabled for a day or two? > > > > > > Also, an unrelated question -- I saw there is an IBM XL compiler on > > > dowd, but it does not have a valid license. Is there another > > > compiler that works on that node? I need something a little more > > > recent than the default gcc 4.4. I've tried unsuccessfully to > > > build a more recent version of gcc. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Paul > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Paul Romano < > > > paul.k.romano(a)gmail.com > wrote: > > > Hi Ben, > > > > > > One aspect of the study I'm performing is to look at any potential > > > differences between the situation you just described, i.e. only > > > using as many threads as there are physical cores with HT enabled, > > > and actually disabling HT altogether, so unfortunately binding to > > > the first hardware thread won't suffice. Once I have everything > > > scripted and ready to go, it shouldn't take more than a day or two > > > to perform the actual runs. > > > > > > Best, > > > Paul > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Allen, Benjamin S. < > > > bsallen(a)alcf.anl.gov > wrote: > > > Hi Paul, > > > > > > Will running your application with taskset or numactl suffice, eg: > > > taskset -c 0-35 cmd or numactl -C 0-35 cmd? Thus pinning the > > > application to the first hardware thread on each core. > > > > > > If not how long do you think you'll need a machine with HT > > > disabled? > > > > > > Ben > > > > > > > On Apr 25, 2015, at 7:31 AM, Paul Romano < promano(a)anl.gov > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I'm currently doing some studies on the impact of hardware > > > > threading on code performance for nuclear reactor neutronic > > > > calculations. I was wondering if it might be possible to have > > > > one of the thing nodes configured with hardware threading > > > > disabled for the sake of running comparisons. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Paul > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Admins mailing list > > > > Admins(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov > > > > https://lists.jlse.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/admins > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Hal Finkel > Assistant Computational Scientist > Leadership Computing Facility > Argonne National Laboratory >

1 0

Re: [JLSE-Admins] Hardware threading on thing nodes
by Hal Finkel 05 May '15

05 May '15

Hi Paul, Ben, I would certainly not object to having a newer base OS on dowd, although we currently do have some newer compilers installed. There are newer compilers installed in: /opt/at7.0/bin/ and you can also use the one in my home directory: /home/hfinkel/install/ppc64/gcc/bin Turning off HT for a few days is fine by me. Please let me know when you're doing it, so that I won't disturb your benchmarks. -Hal ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul Romano" <paul.k.romano(a)gmail.com> > To: "Benjamin S. Allen" <bsallen(a)alcf.anl.gov> > Cc: admins(a)jlse.anl.gov, "Hal J. Finkel" <hfinkel(a)anl.gov> > Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2015 10:20:27 AM > Subject: Re: [JLSE-Admins] Hardware threading on thing nodes > > > Thanks Ben. RHEL6 or 7 are fine, so whatever is easiest. GCC 4.8.2 > would be sufficient for my needs on dowd. > > > Paul > > > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Allen, Benjamin S. < > bsallen(a)alcf.anl.gov > wrote: > > > Hi Paul, > > Yea its possible get a thing node with HT disabled. I'll likely grab > thing03 for this. Hopefully I'll find some time today to change the > BIOS setting. Do you want RHEL6 or 7 on the box? > > We don't have XL licenses unfortunately. If there's a newer version > on IBM's website I can re-install the eval and get another 90 days > out of it. > > We can also look at installing RHEL7 on the box, which has GCC 4.8.2. > Hal Finkel (cc'ed) is the primary user of Dowd, so he'll need to > weigh in on what we should do. > > Ben > > > > > > On May 4, 2015, at 10:25 PM, Paul Romano < paul.k.romano(a)gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > > Hi Ben, > > > > Just wanted to ping you on this. Do you think it will be possible > > to get a thing node with HT disabled for a day or two? > > > > Also, an unrelated question -- I saw there is an IBM XL compiler on > > dowd, but it does not have a valid license. Is there another > > compiler that works on that node? I need something a little more > > recent than the default gcc 4.4. I've tried unsuccessfully to > > build a more recent version of gcc. > > > > Thanks, > > Paul > > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Paul Romano < > > paul.k.romano(a)gmail.com > wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > > > One aspect of the study I'm performing is to look at any potential > > differences between the situation you just described, i.e. only > > using as many threads as there are physical cores with HT enabled, > > and actually disabling HT altogether, so unfortunately binding to > > the first hardware thread won't suffice. Once I have everything > > scripted and ready to go, it shouldn't take more than a day or two > > to perform the actual runs. > > > > Best, > > Paul > > > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Allen, Benjamin S. < > > bsallen(a)alcf.anl.gov > wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > > > Will running your application with taskset or numactl suffice, eg: > > taskset -c 0-35 cmd or numactl -C 0-35 cmd? Thus pinning the > > application to the first hardware thread on each core. > > > > If not how long do you think you'll need a machine with HT > > disabled? > > > > Ben > > > > > On Apr 25, 2015, at 7:31 AM, Paul Romano < promano(a)anl.gov > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm currently doing some studies on the impact of hardware > > > threading on code performance for nuclear reactor neutronic > > > calculations. I was wondering if it might be possible to have > > > one of the thing nodes configured with hardware threading > > > disabled for the sake of running comparisons. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Paul > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Admins mailing list > > > Admins(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov > > > https://lists.jlse.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/admins > > > > > > > > > -- Hal Finkel Assistant Computational Scientist Leadership Computing Facility Argonne National Laboratory

1 0

Re: [JLSE-Admins] Hardware threading on thing nodes
by Paul Romano 05 May '15

05 May '15

Thanks Ben. RHEL6 or 7 are fine, so whatever is easiest. GCC 4.8.2 would be sufficient for my needs on dowd. Paul On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Allen, Benjamin S. <bsallen(a)alcf.anl.gov> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Yea its possible get a thing node with HT disabled. I'll likely grab > thing03 for this. Hopefully I'll find some time today to change the BIOS > setting. Do you want RHEL6 or 7 on the box? > > We don't have XL licenses unfortunately. If there's a newer version on > IBM's website I can re-install the eval and get another 90 days out of it. > > We can also look at installing RHEL7 on the box, which has GCC 4.8.2. Hal > Finkel (cc'ed) is the primary user of Dowd, so he'll need to weigh in on > what we should do. > > Ben > > > > On May 4, 2015, at 10:25 PM, Paul Romano <paul.k.romano(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi Ben, > > > > Just wanted to ping you on this. Do you think it will be possible to get > a thing node with HT disabled for a day or two? > > > > Also, an unrelated question -- I saw there is an IBM XL compiler on > dowd, but it does not have a valid license. Is there another compiler that > works on that node? I need something a little more recent than the default > gcc 4.4. I've tried unsuccessfully to build a more recent version of gcc. > > > > Thanks, > > Paul > > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Paul Romano <paul.k.romano(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > > > One aspect of the study I'm performing is to look at any potential > differences between the situation you just described, i.e. only using as > many threads as there are physical cores with HT enabled, and actually > disabling HT altogether, so unfortunately binding to the first hardware > thread won't suffice. Once I have everything scripted and ready to go, it > shouldn't take more than a day or two to perform the actual runs. > > > > Best, > > Paul > > > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Allen, Benjamin S. < > bsallen(a)alcf.anl.gov> wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > > > Will running your application with taskset or numactl suffice, eg: > taskset -c 0-35 cmd or numactl -C 0-35 cmd? Thus pinning the application to > the first hardware thread on each core. > > > > If not how long do you think you'll need a machine with HT disabled? > > > > Ben > > > > > On Apr 25, 2015, at 7:31 AM, Paul Romano <promano(a)anl.gov> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm currently doing some studies on the impact of hardware threading > on code performance for nuclear reactor neutronic calculations. I was > wondering if it might be possible to have one of the thing nodes configured > with hardware threading disabled for the sake of running comparisons. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Paul > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Admins mailing list > > > Admins(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov > > > https://lists.jlse.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/admins > > > > > > > >

1 0

Re: [JLSE-Admins] Hardware threading on thing nodes
by Allen, Benjamin S. 05 May '15

05 May '15

Hi Paul, Yea its possible get a thing node with HT disabled. I'll likely grab thing03 for this. Hopefully I'll find some time today to change the BIOS setting. Do you want RHEL6 or 7 on the box? We don't have XL licenses unfortunately. If there's a newer version on IBM's website I can re-install the eval and get another 90 days out of it. We can also look at installing RHEL7 on the box, which has GCC 4.8.2. Hal Finkel (cc'ed) is the primary user of Dowd, so he'll need to weigh in on what we should do. Ben > On May 4, 2015, at 10:25 PM, Paul Romano <paul.k.romano(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > Just wanted to ping you on this. Do you think it will be possible to get a thing node with HT disabled for a day or two? > > Also, an unrelated question -- I saw there is an IBM XL compiler on dowd, but it does not have a valid license. Is there another compiler that works on that node? I need something a little more recent than the default gcc 4.4. I've tried unsuccessfully to build a more recent version of gcc. > > Thanks, > Paul > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Paul Romano <paul.k.romano(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ben, > > One aspect of the study I'm performing is to look at any potential differences between the situation you just described, i.e. only using as many threads as there are physical cores with HT enabled, and actually disabling HT altogether, so unfortunately binding to the first hardware thread won't suffice. Once I have everything scripted and ready to go, it shouldn't take more than a day or two to perform the actual runs. > > Best, > Paul > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Allen, Benjamin S. <bsallen(a)alcf.anl.gov> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Will running your application with taskset or numactl suffice, eg: taskset -c 0-35 cmd or numactl -C 0-35 cmd? Thus pinning the application to the first hardware thread on each core. > > If not how long do you think you'll need a machine with HT disabled? > > Ben > > > On Apr 25, 2015, at 7:31 AM, Paul Romano <promano(a)anl.gov> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm currently doing some studies on the impact of hardware threading on code performance for nuclear reactor neutronic calculations. I was wondering if it might be possible to have one of the thing nodes configured with hardware threading disabled for the sake of running comparisons. > > > > Thanks, > > Paul > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Admins mailing list > > Admins(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov > > https://lists.jlse.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/admins > > >

1 0

Re: [JLSE-Admins] Please make me the owner of some of my .* files in my $HOME
by Balakrishnan, Ramesh 05 May '15

05 May '15

Thanks! RB > On May 5, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Allen, Benjamin S. <bsallen(a)alcf.anl.gov> wrote: > > Changed the ownership on all the dot files in your home directory to bramesh:jlse. Your home directory still existed from the migration from Future Tech. > > Ben > >> On May 5, 2015, at 9:35 AM, Balakrishnan, Ramesh <bramesh(a)alcf.anl.gov> wrote: >> >> Hello All, >> As you can see below: >> >> ==================== >> -rw-r--r-- 1 6133 users 18 Mar 25 2014 .bash_logout >> -rw-r--r-- 1 6133 users 176 Mar 25 2014 .bash_profile >> -rw-r--r-- 1 6133 users 124 Mar 25 2014 .bashrc >> -rw-r--r-- 1 6133 users 500 Mar 25 2014 .emacs >> -rw------- 1 6133 users 244 Mar 28 2014 .history >> -rw-r--r-- 1 6133 users 171 Mar 25 2014 .kshrc >> ==================== >> >> I am not the owner of some of the .* files. Could you please change the owner and group of the files (shown above) to bramesh and jlse respectively? >> >> Thanks, >> Ramesh >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Admins mailing list >> Admins(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov >> https://lists.jlse.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/admins >

1 0

Re: [JLSE-Admins] Please make me the owner of some of my .* files in my $HOME
by Allen, Benjamin S. 05 May '15

05 May '15

Changed the ownership on all the dot files in your home directory to bramesh:jlse. Your home directory still existed from the migration from Future Tech. Ben > On May 5, 2015, at 9:35 AM, Balakrishnan, Ramesh <bramesh(a)alcf.anl.gov> wrote: > > Hello All, > As you can see below: > > ==================== > -rw-r--r-- 1 6133 users 18 Mar 25 2014 .bash_logout > -rw-r--r-- 1 6133 users 176 Mar 25 2014 .bash_profile > -rw-r--r-- 1 6133 users 124 Mar 25 2014 .bashrc > -rw-r--r-- 1 6133 users 500 Mar 25 2014 .emacs > -rw------- 1 6133 users 244 Mar 28 2014 .history > -rw-r--r-- 1 6133 users 171 Mar 25 2014 .kshrc > ==================== > > I am not the owner of some of the .* files. Could you please change the owner and group of the files (shown above) to bramesh and jlse respectively? > > Thanks, > Ramesh > > _______________________________________________ > Admins mailing list > Admins(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov > https://lists.jlse.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/admins

1 0

[JLSE-Admins] Please make me the owner of some of my .* files in my $HOME
by Balakrishnan, Ramesh 05 May '15

05 May '15

Hello All, As you can see below: ==================== -rw-r--r-- 1 6133 users 18 Mar 25 2014 .bash_logout -rw-r--r-- 1 6133 users 176 Mar 25 2014 .bash_profile -rw-r--r-- 1 6133 users 124 Mar 25 2014 .bashrc -rw-r--r-- 1 6133 users 500 Mar 25 2014 .emacs -rw------- 1 6133 users 244 Mar 28 2014 .history -rw-r--r-- 1 6133 users 171 Mar 25 2014 .kshrc ==================== I am not the owner of some of the .* files. Could you please change the owner and group of the files (shown above) to bramesh and jlse respectively? Thanks, Ramesh

1 0

Re: [JLSE-Admins] Hardware threading on thing nodes
by Paul Romano 04 May '15

04 May '15

Hi Ben, Just wanted to ping you on this. Do you think it will be possible to get a thing node with HT disabled for a day or two? Also, an unrelated question -- I saw there is an IBM XL compiler on dowd, but it does not have a valid license. Is there another compiler that works on that node? I need something a little more recent than the default gcc 4.4. I've tried unsuccessfully to build a more recent version of gcc. Thanks, Paul On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Paul Romano <paul.k.romano(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ben, > > One aspect of the study I'm performing is to look at any potential > differences between the situation you just described, i.e. only using as > many threads as there are physical cores with HT enabled, and actually > disabling HT altogether, so unfortunately binding to the first hardware > thread won't suffice. Once I have everything scripted and ready to go, it > shouldn't take more than a day or two to perform the actual runs. > > Best, > Paul > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Allen, Benjamin S. <bsallen(a)alcf.anl.gov> > wrote: > >> Hi Paul, >> >> Will running your application with taskset or numactl suffice, eg: >> taskset -c 0-35 cmd or numactl -C 0-35 cmd? Thus pinning the application to >> the first hardware thread on each core. >> >> If not how long do you think you'll need a machine with HT disabled? >> >> Ben >> >> > On Apr 25, 2015, at 7:31 AM, Paul Romano <promano(a)anl.gov> wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > I'm currently doing some studies on the impact of hardware threading on >> code performance for nuclear reactor neutronic calculations. I was >> wondering if it might be possible to have one of the thing nodes configured >> with hardware threading disabled for the sake of running comparisons. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Paul >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Admins mailing list >> > Admins(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov >> > https://lists.jlse.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/admins >> >> >

1 0

Re: [JLSE-Admins] how can I set my email to ALCF and not gmail? in this list [email protected]
by Allen, Benjamin S. 04 May '15

04 May '15

Hi Marta, I unsubscribed your gmail address from users and discuss(a)jlse.anl.gov and subscribed mgarcia(a)alcf.anl.gov. Ben > On May 4, 2015, at 4:07 PM, Kalyan Kumaran <kumaran(a)anl.gov> wrote: > > Whatever email you signed up with. If you signed up with your anl account it will be that. Looks like you signed up w gmail. > > CCing admins. > > -Kumar > > >> On May 4, 2015, at 4:00 PM, Garcia Martinez, Marta <mgarcia(a)alcf.anl.gov> wrote: >> >> Hi Kumar, >> >> I changed this today from my JLSE account settings but it seems that I still receive emails to my gmail account. >> >> Do you see which email address is there for me in users(a)jlse.anl.gov? >> >> Thanks, >> Marta > > _______________________________________________ > Admins mailing list > Admins(a)lists.jlse.anl.gov > https://lists.jlse.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/admins

1 0