Re: [Ssio-2018] reminder of homework
We were hoping to have a complete draft Nov. 9. I understand the situation. Do what you can. -- Rob On Oct 30, 2018, at 12:40 PM, Glenn Lockwood via ssio-2018 <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: What is the intended deadline for having all of this done? I am a bit under water right now with SC and facilities stuff, but if it needs to be done before SC I can shuffle obligations around. Glenn On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:33 AM Ross, Robert B. via ssio-2018 <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: The workshop discussion is primarily meant to be more comprehensive than the distilled PRDs. I think what you have is ok, although you might want to add an introductory paragraph that just says the discussion followed a different organization than we had originally envisioned, or something like that? rob On Oct 30, 2018, at 12:11 PM, Mohror, Kathryn <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Rob, Thanks for this. Somehow I didn’t get that the workshop discussion and the promising research directions were two separate sections. In my mind the outcome of the workshop discussion *was* the promising research directions so they were the same. Is the workshop discussion supposed to be more of just notes on the discussion (in whatever order they occurred) and the PRD supposed to be distilled and organized as we did in the slides we made recently? Thanks, Kathryn From: ssio-2018 <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf Of Ross, Robert B. via ssio-2018 Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 8:37 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [Ssio-2018] reminder of homework Hi all, To recap, there are (at least) three things that we all ought to be making sure are done right now: 1. Writing up a "Workshop Discussion" sub subsection for whatever sections you're assigned to. 2. Writing up a "Promising Research Directions" sub subsection (following the above) for whatever sections you're assigned to. 3. Writing up a narrative in the PRD slides that captures some additional detail, beyond the material in the slide. (2) and (3) are related. Here are some quick notes on how Phil and I accomplished writing the (1) Workshop Discussion sub subsection for the Understanding subsection. Feel free to do your own thing, but we thought this might be helpful: a. Made a copy of the notes from the discussion at the workshop, cut out the intro stuff. b. Noted that the discussion followed the pre-workshop organization, so followed that in the new sub subsection. c. Split up the areas, wrote up 0.5-1.0 pages of narrative for each (e.g., Modeling Systems), with an inline header for each in the sub subsection. Marked off items in the (copy of) the notes as we went, as a sanity check that we got everything written down. d. Added an additional paragraph for "Facilitating Research", which covers the testbed and data availability topics. We're going to move on to the (2) PRD subsubsection next. We plan to write that first, then do (3). Best, Rob and Phil _______________________________________________ ssio-2018 mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ssio-2018 _______________________________________________ ssio-2018 mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ssio-2018
participants (1)
-
Ross, Robert B.