On the facilities panel, should we have an NNSA facilities representative as well?

 

Kathryn

 

From: ssio-2018 <ssio-2018-bounces@lists.mcs.anl.gov> On Behalf Of Ross, Robert B.
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2018 1:37 PM
To: ssio-2018@lists.mcs.anl.gov
Subject: Re: [Ssio-2018] notes from call

 

Note to self, put a "respond by XXX" date on invites in the future. Just in case. -- Rob



On Jul 26, 2018, at 3:21 PM, Ross, Robert B. <rross@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

 

Hi all,

 

Some quick notes from the call today:

 

Invitations. First 60-ish have gone out, per discussion on last call. So far we have about 20 accepts (including the organizers) and no declines. I'm updating the attendees spreadsheet in the top-level folder on Google drive.

 

Panels. We were talking about speakers, and we seem to have converged on two panels.

1. Facilities panel session. There's some sort of roll-up of requirements from applications (presented by one of us?), followed by a panel session with the facilities (ALCF, OLCF, NERSC, ESNet, anyone else?). We would need to iterate with the facility folks to make sure that they agree with the roll-up. Still needs a little thinking.

 

2. Tech panel session. This one might have short talks from each person followed by Q&A. Tim Feldman, Bruce Jacob, and Dmitry Katramatos were suggested as panelists, possibly a DB person also (Remzi or David Andersen as a possible person from the pool of existing invitees).

 

Please keep writing. We will revisit attendees next week and further discuss this panels idea.

 

Thanks,

 

Rob