October 2018 - Ssio-2018 - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

Re: [Ssio-2018] another opportunity (?)/exercise
by Grider, Gary Alan 19 Oct '18

19 Oct '18

Yes, I may have that documentation if you need it On 10/19/18, 8:50 AM, "Ross, Robert B." <rross(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: Probably scalable I/O initiative is in there somewhere too. -- Rob > On Oct 19, 2018, at 9:46 AM, Grider, Gary Alan <ggrider(a)lanl.gov> wrote: > > I don’t know if ascr put money into hecfsio, I know nnsa and nsf and dod put money in. > If so, then there is a ton of stuff > > On 10/19/18, 8:44 AM, "ssio-2018 on behalf of Ross, Robert B." <ssio-2018-bounces(a)lists.mcs.anl.gov on behalf of rross(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Paul Messina is working on a report for Binkly related to impactful activities from ASCR during 1977-present. He's asked if I could put together something related to data, 2-4 pages, in this space. I negotiated this down to 2-4 pages on SSIO specifically, thinking that you all would want to help craft this, and that I could ask Rajeev and others for some help in identifying ASCR-supported contributions and crafting a narrative at least back into the 90s. > > He's going to poke Arie, Ian, and Kerstin for more breadth and has been talking with Jim Ahrens re: visualization and analysis, but I/we aren't responsible for those pieces. I have heard that there is some ADIOS text around already, and Paul is going to send that to me to go into this narrative. > > At this point I think the main question is this: What major activities did ASCR support that have contributed to success in the SSIO space? Then we can associate a timeline with them and write a scaffold around them, I guess. > > Specific products/outcomes that come to mind for me are mostly self-serving unfortunately: > - ROMIO > - HDF > - PVFS > - ADIOS > - PnetCDF > - IOFSL and Mochi > - Dataspaces > - data containers from LBL > - Darshan and TOKIO > - DeltaFS > > Please let me know what I'm missing. What did ASCR support out of UCSC, for example? > > Thanks, > > Rob > _______________________________________________ > ssio-2018 mailing list > ssio-2018(a)lists.mcs.anl.gov > https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ssio-2018 > >

1 0

Re: [Ssio-2018] another opportunity (?)/exercise
by Grider, Gary Alan 19 Oct '18

19 Oct '18

I have all the hecfsio stuff if you find that it was partially funded by ascr Also the shut down scidic pdsi that did more data releases than ever and since I think And polished on plfs which became the foundation for modern burst buffer software from most vendors And the predecessor to the current ecp follow on to scr. I don’t know if mdhim was partially funded or not, I cant remember but if so that is the other half of the current ecp follow on to scr. I don’t remember what all was in pdsi but while it got killed it may have had more impact than many scidacs that completed In the larger scheme of things. On 10/19/18, 8:50 AM, "Ross, Robert B." <rross(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: Ah of course. Lucy probably has some more thorough lists of prior projects? -- Rob > On Oct 19, 2018, at 9:46 AM, Grider, Gary Alan <ggrider(a)lanl.gov> wrote: > > I don’t know if ascr put money into hecfsio, I know nnsa and nsf and dod put money in. > If so, then there is a ton of stuff > > On 10/19/18, 8:44 AM, "ssio-2018 on behalf of Ross, Robert B." <ssio-2018-bounces(a)lists.mcs.anl.gov on behalf of rross(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Paul Messina is working on a report for Binkly related to impactful activities from ASCR during 1977-present. He's asked if I could put together something related to data, 2-4 pages, in this space. I negotiated this down to 2-4 pages on SSIO specifically, thinking that you all would want to help craft this, and that I could ask Rajeev and others for some help in identifying ASCR-supported contributions and crafting a narrative at least back into the 90s. > > He's going to poke Arie, Ian, and Kerstin for more breadth and has been talking with Jim Ahrens re: visualization and analysis, but I/we aren't responsible for those pieces. I have heard that there is some ADIOS text around already, and Paul is going to send that to me to go into this narrative. > > At this point I think the main question is this: What major activities did ASCR support that have contributed to success in the SSIO space? Then we can associate a timeline with them and write a scaffold around them, I guess. > > Specific products/outcomes that come to mind for me are mostly self-serving unfortunately: > - ROMIO > - HDF > - PVFS > - ADIOS > - PnetCDF > - IOFSL and Mochi > - Dataspaces > - data containers from LBL > - Darshan and TOKIO > - DeltaFS > > Please let me know what I'm missing. What did ASCR support out of UCSC, for example? > > Thanks, > > Rob > _______________________________________________ > ssio-2018 mailing list > ssio-2018(a)lists.mcs.anl.gov > https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ssio-2018 > >

1 0

Re: [Ssio-2018] another opportunity (?)/exercise
by Ross, Robert B. 19 Oct '18

19 Oct '18

Probably scalable I/O initiative is in there somewhere too. -- Rob > On Oct 19, 2018, at 9:46 AM, Grider, Gary Alan <ggrider(a)lanl.gov> wrote: > > I don’t know if ascr put money into hecfsio, I know nnsa and nsf and dod put money in. > If so, then there is a ton of stuff > > On 10/19/18, 8:44 AM, "ssio-2018 on behalf of Ross, Robert B." <ssio-2018-bounces(a)lists.mcs.anl.gov on behalf of rross(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Paul Messina is working on a report for Binkly related to impactful activities from ASCR during 1977-present. He's asked if I could put together something related to data, 2-4 pages, in this space. I negotiated this down to 2-4 pages on SSIO specifically, thinking that you all would want to help craft this, and that I could ask Rajeev and others for some help in identifying ASCR-supported contributions and crafting a narrative at least back into the 90s. > > He's going to poke Arie, Ian, and Kerstin for more breadth and has been talking with Jim Ahrens re: visualization and analysis, but I/we aren't responsible for those pieces. I have heard that there is some ADIOS text around already, and Paul is going to send that to me to go into this narrative. > > At this point I think the main question is this: What major activities did ASCR support that have contributed to success in the SSIO space? Then we can associate a timeline with them and write a scaffold around them, I guess. > > Specific products/outcomes that come to mind for me are mostly self-serving unfortunately: > - ROMIO > - HDF > - PVFS > - ADIOS > - PnetCDF > - IOFSL and Mochi > - Dataspaces > - data containers from LBL > - Darshan and TOKIO > - DeltaFS > > Please let me know what I'm missing. What did ASCR support out of UCSC, for example? > > Thanks, > > Rob > _______________________________________________ > ssio-2018 mailing list > ssio-2018(a)lists.mcs.anl.gov > https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ssio-2018 > >

1 0

Re: [Ssio-2018] another opportunity (?)/exercise
by Ross, Robert B. 19 Oct '18

19 Oct '18

Ah of course. Lucy probably has some more thorough lists of prior projects? -- Rob > On Oct 19, 2018, at 9:46 AM, Grider, Gary Alan <ggrider(a)lanl.gov> wrote: > > I don’t know if ascr put money into hecfsio, I know nnsa and nsf and dod put money in. > If so, then there is a ton of stuff > > On 10/19/18, 8:44 AM, "ssio-2018 on behalf of Ross, Robert B." <ssio-2018-bounces(a)lists.mcs.anl.gov on behalf of rross(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Paul Messina is working on a report for Binkly related to impactful activities from ASCR during 1977-present. He's asked if I could put together something related to data, 2-4 pages, in this space. I negotiated this down to 2-4 pages on SSIO specifically, thinking that you all would want to help craft this, and that I could ask Rajeev and others for some help in identifying ASCR-supported contributions and crafting a narrative at least back into the 90s. > > He's going to poke Arie, Ian, and Kerstin for more breadth and has been talking with Jim Ahrens re: visualization and analysis, but I/we aren't responsible for those pieces. I have heard that there is some ADIOS text around already, and Paul is going to send that to me to go into this narrative. > > At this point I think the main question is this: What major activities did ASCR support that have contributed to success in the SSIO space? Then we can associate a timeline with them and write a scaffold around them, I guess. > > Specific products/outcomes that come to mind for me are mostly self-serving unfortunately: > - ROMIO > - HDF > - PVFS > - ADIOS > - PnetCDF > - IOFSL and Mochi > - Dataspaces > - data containers from LBL > - Darshan and TOKIO > - DeltaFS > > Please let me know what I'm missing. What did ASCR support out of UCSC, for example? > > Thanks, > > Rob > _______________________________________________ > ssio-2018 mailing list > ssio-2018(a)lists.mcs.anl.gov > https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ssio-2018 > >

1 0

Re: [Ssio-2018] another opportunity (?)/exercise
by Grider, Gary Alan 19 Oct '18

19 Oct '18

I don’t know if ascr put money into hecfsio, I know nnsa and nsf and dod put money in. If so, then there is a ton of stuff On 10/19/18, 8:44 AM, "ssio-2018 on behalf of Ross, Robert B." <ssio-2018-bounces(a)lists.mcs.anl.gov on behalf of rross(a)mcs.anl.gov> wrote: Hi all, Paul Messina is working on a report for Binkly related to impactful activities from ASCR during 1977-present. He's asked if I could put together something related to data, 2-4 pages, in this space. I negotiated this down to 2-4 pages on SSIO specifically, thinking that you all would want to help craft this, and that I could ask Rajeev and others for some help in identifying ASCR-supported contributions and crafting a narrative at least back into the 90s. He's going to poke Arie, Ian, and Kerstin for more breadth and has been talking with Jim Ahrens re: visualization and analysis, but I/we aren't responsible for those pieces. I have heard that there is some ADIOS text around already, and Paul is going to send that to me to go into this narrative. At this point I think the main question is this: What major activities did ASCR support that have contributed to success in the SSIO space? Then we can associate a timeline with them and write a scaffold around them, I guess. Specific products/outcomes that come to mind for me are mostly self-serving unfortunately: - ROMIO - HDF - PVFS - ADIOS - PnetCDF - IOFSL and Mochi - Dataspaces - data containers from LBL - Darshan and TOKIO - DeltaFS Please let me know what I'm missing. What did ASCR support out of UCSC, for example? Thanks, Rob _______________________________________________ ssio-2018 mailing list ssio-2018(a)lists.mcs.anl.gov https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ssio-2018

1 0

another opportunity (?)/exercise
by Ross, Robert B. 19 Oct '18

19 Oct '18

Hi all, Paul Messina is working on a report for Binkly related to impactful activities from ASCR during 1977-present. He's asked if I could put together something related to data, 2-4 pages, in this space. I negotiated this down to 2-4 pages on SSIO specifically, thinking that you all would want to help craft this, and that I could ask Rajeev and others for some help in identifying ASCR-supported contributions and crafting a narrative at least back into the 90s. He's going to poke Arie, Ian, and Kerstin for more breadth and has been talking with Jim Ahrens re: visualization and analysis, but I/we aren't responsible for those pieces. I have heard that there is some ADIOS text around already, and Paul is going to send that to me to go into this narrative. At this point I think the main question is this: What major activities did ASCR support that have contributed to success in the SSIO space? Then we can associate a timeline with them and write a scaffold around them, I guess. Specific products/outcomes that come to mind for me are mostly self-serving unfortunately: - ROMIO - HDF - PVFS - ADIOS - PnetCDF - IOFSL and Mochi - Dataspaces - data containers from LBL - Darshan and TOKIO - DeltaFS Please let me know what I'm missing. What did ASCR support out of UCSC, for example? Thanks, Rob

1 0

brochure
by Ross, Robert B. 19 Oct '18

19 Oct '18

The brochure is here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dQTvPIlFqJD3pfLCBq3_uKqkiyeB4kLf/view?usp=… Not a lot of text, just a good paragraph or so for each area. Let's talk about this during the next call. Rob

1 0

Re: [Ssio-2018] SC SSIO meeting
by Settlemyer, Bradley Wade 18 Oct '18

18 Oct '18

At present the ASC room is booked at 3pm. I’m speaking with the person who has it to make sure they still intend to use it at that time, but not likely to be free. Cheers, Brad From: "Ross, Robert B." <rross(a)mcs.anl.gov> Date: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 at 1:42 PM To: "Settlemyer, Bradley Wade" <bws(a)lanl.gov> Cc: "Mohror, Kathryn" <mohror1(a)llnl.gov>, "ssio-2018(a)lists.mcs.anl.gov" <ssio-2018(a)lists.mcs.anl.gov> Subject: Re: [Ssio-2018] SC SSIO meeting Ok. I'm following a thread with the SC organizers; let's see which one seems to work out better. -- Rob On Oct 9, 2018, at 9:51 PM, Settlemyer, Bradley Wade <bws(a)lanl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Gary mentioned that LANL and/or ASC has a room. I will try to book those since our time is fixed now. Cheers, Brad From: ssio-2018 <ssio-2018-bounces(a)lists.mcs.anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of "Ross, Robert B." <rross(a)mcs.anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Monday, October 8, 2018 at 8:31 AM To: "Mohror, Kathryn" <mohror1(a)llnl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "ssio-2018(a)lists.mcs.anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>" <ssio-2018(a)lists.mcs.anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [Ssio-2018] SC SSIO meeting As an alternative, there are often rooms available around, if we ask the organizers. Anyone deep in the organization this year? — Rob On Oct 6, 2018, at 7:49 AM, Mohror, Kathryn <mohror1(a)llnl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi all, I saw in Brad’s note that we don’t have a location for our meeting at SC yet. I thought we could possibly use the DOE booth, at least it should be relatively easy to get a reservation in the “conversation room” (little room in the back of the booth with a door, table, chairs). The downsides of the booth are that it is loud even in that closed room so if people are joining by phone it is hard to hear, and that it fits maybe 6 comfortably (more is less comfortable). What do you think? I can try to reserve it if you agree. Kathryn _________________________________________________________________ Kathryn Mohror, kathryn(a)llnl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>, https://people.llnl.gov/kathryn Data Analysis Group<https://computation.llnl.gov/casc/data-analysis-group> @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA _______________________________________________ ssio-2018 mailing list ssio-2018(a)lists.mcs.anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ssio-2018

1 0

Re: [Ssio-2018] SC SSIO meeting
by Ross, Robert B. 10 Oct '18

10 Oct '18

Ok. I'm following a thread with the SC organizers; let's see which one seems to work out better. -- Rob On Oct 9, 2018, at 9:51 PM, Settlemyer, Bradley Wade <bws(a)lanl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Gary mentioned that LANL and/or ASC has a room. I will try to book those since our time is fixed now. Cheers, Brad From: ssio-2018 <ssio-2018-bounces(a)lists.mcs.anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of "Ross, Robert B." <rross(a)mcs.anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Monday, October 8, 2018 at 8:31 AM To: "Mohror, Kathryn" <mohror1(a)llnl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "ssio-2018(a)lists.mcs.anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>" <ssio-2018(a)lists.mcs.anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [Ssio-2018] SC SSIO meeting As an alternative, there are often rooms available around, if we ask the organizers. Anyone deep in the organization this year? — Rob On Oct 6, 2018, at 7:49 AM, Mohror, Kathryn <mohror1(a)llnl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi all, I saw in Brad’s note that we don’t have a location for our meeting at SC yet. I thought we could possibly use the DOE booth, at least it should be relatively easy to get a reservation in the “conversation room” (little room in the back of the booth with a door, table, chairs). The downsides of the booth are that it is loud even in that closed room so if people are joining by phone it is hard to hear, and that it fits maybe 6 comfortably (more is less comfortable). What do you think? I can try to reserve it if you agree. Kathryn _________________________________________________________________ Kathryn Mohror, kathryn(a)llnl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>, https://people.llnl.gov/kathryn Data Analysis Group<https://computation.llnl.gov/casc/data-analysis-group> @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA _______________________________________________ ssio-2018 mailing list ssio-2018(a)lists.mcs.anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ssio-2018

1 0

Re: [Ssio-2018] SC SSIO meeting
by Settlemyer, Bradley Wade 09 Oct '18

09 Oct '18

Gary mentioned that LANL and/or ASC has a room. I will try to book those since our time is fixed now. Cheers, Brad From: ssio-2018 <ssio-2018-bounces(a)lists.mcs.anl.gov> on behalf of "Ross, Robert B." <rross(a)mcs.anl.gov> Date: Monday, October 8, 2018 at 8:31 AM To: "Mohror, Kathryn" <mohror1(a)llnl.gov> Cc: "ssio-2018(a)lists.mcs.anl.gov" <ssio-2018(a)lists.mcs.anl.gov> Subject: Re: [Ssio-2018] SC SSIO meeting As an alternative, there are often rooms available around, if we ask the organizers. Anyone deep in the organization this year? — Rob On Oct 6, 2018, at 7:49 AM, Mohror, Kathryn <mohror1(a)llnl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi all, I saw in Brad’s note that we don’t have a location for our meeting at SC yet. I thought we could possibly use the DOE booth, at least it should be relatively easy to get a reservation in the “conversation room” (little room in the back of the booth with a door, table, chairs). The downsides of the booth are that it is loud even in that closed room so if people are joining by phone it is hard to hear, and that it fits maybe 6 comfortably (more is less comfortable). What do you think? I can try to reserve it if you agree. Kathryn _________________________________________________________________ Kathryn Mohror, kathryn(a)llnl.gov<mailto:[email protected]>, https://people.llnl.gov/kathryn Data Analysis Group<https://computation.llnl.gov/casc/data-analysis-group> @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA _______________________________________________ ssio-2018 mailing list ssio-2018(a)lists.mcs.anl.gov<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ssio-2018

1 0