I don't recall updating the spreadsheet. However, my recollection is that we don't have any tests for AWE and Shock anyway. So I'm not sure how we validate it. I'm working on an issue related to shock, but I now think it may be related to the python request library. --Shane On Jan 14, 2014, at 3:26 PM, "Murphy-Olson, Daniel E." <[email protected]> wrote:

Miriam,

I believe Shane was working on troubleshooting the shock issues, and he may know the details behind the anonymous edits.

I haven't made any updates other than opening the new workspace service up. Tomorrow we're going to need a big push to get everything to production. I'll be available all day.

---- Daniel Murphy-Olson Systems Administrator Mathematics & Computer Science Division Argonne National Laboratory 630-252-0055

________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Land, Miriam L. [[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 2:12 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Release-team] Status of modules for the Jan. 15 deadline

All,

I haven't seen any status changes in the KBase Services spreadsheet since I left on Friday. Have there been any changes?

I noticed that 'anonymous' marked Shock and Workspace deluxe as 'okay to deploy to production' and 'deployed on prod' without passing testing and Shock had no review of script standards, documentation, or release notes. I'm okay with having exceptions in our process but why are we doing it as anonymous and without explanation/documentation??

Miriam _______________________________________________ Release-team mailing list [email protected] https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/release-team _______________________________________________ Release-team mailing list [email protected] https://lists.kbase.us/mailman/listinfo/release-team