I don't see anyone expressing any strong opinions. I'm okay with putting it in if that is what your gut is telling you. Miriam From: Nomi Harris <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Thursday, February 6, 2014 3:09 PM To: Miriam Land <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [Release-team] Status of some services Yeah, but several other services on that page (e.g., Protein Info, ID Service) also have no command-line commands and are only available via the API. I think if ID Mapping has been deployed to production and can be called via the API, we should include it. On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Land, Miriam L. <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: It doesn't have any command-line commands yet. I would vote 'No' this time around. Miriam From: Nomi Harris <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>> Date: Thursday, February 6, 2014 2:57 PM To: Miriam Land <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>> Subject: Re: [Release-team] Status of some services Thanks for the update. Marcin said that MAK was used to produce some datasets but is not (yet) exposed to the public. Did we determine that ID Mapping should be added to the Services page? Nomi On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Land, Miriam L. <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: Nomi, Bambi and MAK did not make the cutoff and will not be deployed. All the others are moving alone nicely. Miriam From: Nomi Harris <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>>> Date: Thursday, February 6, 2014 2:57 AM To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>>> Cc: Pavel Novichkov <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>>> Subject: [Release-team] Status of some services Someone was going to ask Andreas whether the Communities QC service has been fixed. Did anyone ask? I'm still unsure about whether the following new services should be added to the Services web page: Bambi (did it get deployed?) cMonkey Expression Inferelator MEME I found out that MAK is internal (for now, anyway)--it was used to create some datasets but is not publicly accessible, so it doesn't need to be added to the Services page. That might also be true of cMonkey and possibly some of the other services I listed. Thanks, Nomi