On May 15, 2014, at 10:33 AM, Thomas Brettin <[email protected]> wrote:

On May 13, 2014, at 11:06 PM, Thomas Brettin <[email protected]> wrote:

...

Nomi has pointed out, and I think she is correct, that our downloads page needs to be updated before the renewal proposal lands in the hands of the review team. This gives us about 2-3 weeks.

We need to decide what is possible.I’d like to schedule a meeting to discuss this on before the end of the week India will get in touch to see what time is best.

Thanks, Tom

It’s now been 2-1/2 weeks. I plan to ask Erik today to take the old disk images off the Downloads page (and move them to the “Older releases” page). When the new images are ready, we can add them to the Downloads page. I think it’s better not to have any images up than to have reviewers downloading extremely old images with client code that presumably won’t work with some of the current services. I don’t actually see anything on the Downloads page that is worth having up there now—maybe the “.vmdk Daily Development Snapshot”? Do those work? I clicked on it and it downloaded a huge file, but there’s no date or version info attached to it, so it’s impossible to tell how old the contents are.