On May 22, 2013, at 4:44 PM, Kathryn Mohror <[email protected]> wrote:

...

Page 9 (Page 14 in Word), Comment JD19: I think we agreed that we would not include the mpimsgq_dll_locations in this version and leave all extensions/improvements to document V1.1 or V2.0

Right, I agree that we're only trying to document what the state of things is. However, he says the at OpenMPI implements this. Is that so Jeff? And does a debugger support it? If so, I'd think we want to mention it.

Sorry; I didn't see this before. Yes, OMPI implements it. But this is new/proposed -- it's not standardizing current practice (i.e., just because OMPI does it doesn't mean that it's current practice). So I'd keep just the old way of listing the DLL; don't put the new way in -- that will go in version 1.1, or somesuch. -- Jeff Squyres [email protected] For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/