Hello all I provided a presentation on how one might use PMIx to support debugger attach/launch. Kathryn has a copy that she will be posting to the working group’s wiki, but you can also find it here: https://github.com/pmix/publications/blob/master/PMIxDebugger.pptx I have attached a file that contains the debugger-related attributes and structures we have defined so far. As I said during the presentation, these are just an initial draft I’ve been using for the POC - if the WG decides to pursue this approach, we would turn definition of such things over to you. I should also note that I was corrected later in the day regarding my response to the question about PMIx adoption. I had inadvertently neglected my IBM and Fujitsu friends, both of whom will be releasing PMIx servers in the near future, as well as the LLNL Flux RM that is under development. My concluding statement that we are essentially missing only 1-2 environments remains correct, to the best of our knowledge, and we continue to work to fill those gaps. HTH Ralph

On Jul 26, 2016, at 7:49 AM, Kathryn Mohror <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi all,

This is your reminder of our regularly scheduled Tools WG meeting Thursday 7/28 at 8:00 AM PDT, 11:00 AM EDT, 5:00 PM CEST. There is a chance I will not make the meeting, but Anh has agreed to lead the call in my absence.

Please go to the meeting page for the link to join the webex: https://github.com/mpiwg-tools/tools-issues/wiki/Meetings

Agenda: - Talk about PMIX RFC - Discuss issues/differences in launching versus attaching debuggers - Discuss tools that need job discovery/co-launch but are not debuggers

Kathryn _________________________________________________________________ Kathryn Mohror, [email protected], http://scalability.llnl.gov/ Scalability Team @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA

_______________________________________________ mpiwg-tools mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-tools