Hi Kathryn, I agree to the agenda.

This is what I think we have: o MPIR being_debugged: Issue #5 (https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/5) Pull request: https://github.com/mpiwg-tools/mpir/pull/3 o MPI_T code example error: Errata Issue #12 (https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/12)

Pull request #7 (https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/7)

For the MPIR line numbers (Issue #6: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/6), I think we still need to do further evaluation. I propose to leave that until the March meeting. It is not critical, I don't believe.

Yes, a little bit more discussion is needed on this. I attached a PDF to the tools-issue. It would be great if everyone could have a look at it to see if this is the kind of line numbering we want. If we want the "classic" line numbering, I will need to work on a different LaTeX changeset.

If I don't hear from anyone, I will assume these are correct and send them out to the Forum list Monday (probably around noon).

Sounds good. Cheers, Marc-Andre -- Marc-Andre Hermanns Jülich Aachen Research Alliance, High Performance Computing (JARA-HPC) Jülich Supercomputing Centre (JSC) Schinkelstrasse 2 52062 Aachen Germany Phone: +49 2461 61 2509 | +49 241 80 24381 Fax: +49 2461 80 6 99753 www.jara.org/jara-hpc email: [email protected]