How's this for a new suggestion: ----- Variables with the same name in connected processes are required to: * Adhere to the same definition from the MPI implementation * Exhibit the same behavioral semantics * Return the same INOUT and OUT values from the relevant MPI_T_*_GET_INFO function, with the exception that OUT index values may differ between different processes Similarly, enumerations and categories with the same name in connected processes must also obey the above restrictions, Advice to implementors. The intent of these requirements is to enforce consistent meanings of variables, categories, and enumerations across connected processes. For example, variables describing the number of packets sent across different network device types should have different names to reflect their potentially different meanings. (End of advice to implementors.) ----- On Apr 17, 2014, at 1:35 PM, Kathryn Mohror <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi all,

For anyone who wanted to muck with the text for ticket 383, I put the document into the tools working group repository (trunk/working-groups/mpi-3/tools/MPI-3.1-toolsWG).

Kathryn _________________________________________________________________ Kathryn Mohror, [email protected], http://scalability.llnl.gov/ Scalability Team @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA

_______________________________________________ mpiwg-tools mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-tools

-- Jeff Squyres [email protected] For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/