Hi all, It's official. We'll now be meeting weekly, alternating between "tools" and "debuggers" topics each week. This week will be debugger topics and we'll alternate from there. Kathryn _________________________________________________________________ Kathryn Mohror, kathryn@llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/ Scalability Team @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA-----Original Message----- From: mpiwg-tools [mailto:mpiwg-tools-bounces@mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Mohror, Kathryn Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 8:48 AM To: mpiwg-tools@mpi-forum.org; MPI Forum <mpiwg-tools@lists.mpi- forum.org> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-tools] Extra meetings Hi all, Anyone else want to chime in before we make a final decision? I'll give itacouple days, and then start planning based on the responses (which appear to be unanimous for adding more meetings). Kathryn __________________________________________________________ _______ Kathryn Mohror, kathryn@llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/ ScalabilityTeam@ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA-----Original Message----- From: mpiwg-tools [mailto:mpiwg-tools-bounces@mpi-forum.org] OnBehalfOf Kathryn Mohror Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2016 12:32 PM To: MPI Forum <mpiwg-tools@lists.mpi-forum.org> Subject: [mpiwg-tools] Extra meetings Hi all, Last week on the call, we discussed an issue that has come up: Whilepeoplelike the division between "tools calls" and "debugger calls" (where wefocuson one topic area at each bi-weekly meeting), that means that we onlytalkabout tools or debuggers once a month. This limits the amount ofprogresswe can make significantly, and the likelihood that we need to rehash old news increases since so much time has passed. An idea was to increase the frequency of Tools WG meetings to weekly,andthen continue to alternate "tools calls" and "debugger calls" so thatnoweachwill meet bi-weekly instead of monthly. This idea was agreeable to thefolkson the call on March 24, but since it was a "tools call" there were notverymany debugger people attending. So, I am sending this email to try toget afeel of what the larger group thinks. How do debugger people feel about this idea? Do you have the cycles to devote to a bi-weekly meeting? (We could always cancel one if progresshasbeen slowed for some reason) Do you have the alternating 8:00 AM/11:00 AM slot free? Okay, in a (possibly futile) attempt to streamline this, I have made adoodlepoll to get feedback on this: http://doodle.com/poll/hpnksh527ptt5kqp FILL IT OUT NOW. IT IS EASY. THERE ARE ONLY TWO QUESTIONS :-) Kathryn_________________________________________________________________ Kathryn Mohror, kathryn@llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/ScalabilityTeam@ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA _______________________________________________ mpiwg-tools mailing list mpiwg-tools@mpi-forum.org http://secure-web.cisco.com/1viitSY8xM8b1yS-zM8hja-QXiG7bri4kOWrqgsZxNawaR2lou7iStOEbP2JhcPogJf6pHDvXHsw3vbpveyU8i_yDgFTRJxMRpZtBu8h7G9ulxT6pwuTbC94iw5OZgLhbAITJSa3Ekq0S4czszNXySXoup8GiUy5fGG7y4wbTEhG-950kc1Ql47YmFKLuo6HBWuVVJZqYHrg-p_lQPcE-bsD21cO1jp78HOYs6MpMgYnuQVft5CxETeATl1a9_rRhXGbu6Z76LPMr4n- XJEAx17PoRHMh7zclbiLUUR1vUqh-zfmzN36BIaJTlY030eauVqhcGZoWFSZjkqoM6upx4LtHkinSS_3Egx18DIx7Om0/http%3A%2F%2Flists.mpi-forum.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo.cgi%2Fmpiwg- tools_______________________________________________ mpiwg-tools mailing list mpiwg-tools@mpi-forum.org http://secure- web.cisco.com/13dqOv_9oL4KvJNzWDReupIC05G1EbZQ1w3lk85D1kUAIUJg0 ubqfDUb0wzb8MzEimE6HZcR41Ai2Rrls-KSOIFQMb-- Qz4rmdwgHEFTZNCVjEfs_05FrnVn0QRr4PUWBGLOwWj- zRdWAAUseMMOMP0DZP0mPn98eDpDp6kdxlS_k1S3UnU6G173Qw_66OCT RmEAoQHboYjZfmd7bhjZBEJwUUWfxvXz- zzWEbv97IsMDGNqR1IAqnNH6Cc91ks8mehhgNzla- 74ukZK8xek1FmBNC44iU5OZ6rE4TxyOl9fTEjUfYB- hXC2TvERcxCUQriNXi3CWYQVbqtit043LJ2zy_coHHLmGcVbVvfN4vTA/http%3 A%2F%2Flists.mpi-forum.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo.cgi%2Fmpiwg-tools_______________________________________________ mpiwg-tools mailing list mpiwg-tools@mpi-forum.org http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-tools