Yes it is :-) If it bothers you I don’t mind if you change it. I had it that way because it was just a copy of MPI-3.1 from the approved directory.

Kathryn

On Apr 18, 2014, at 6:38 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquyres@cisco.com> wrote:

On Apr 17, 2014, at 1:35 PM, Kathryn Mohror <kathryn@llnl.gov> wrote:

For anyone who wanted to muck with the text for ticket 383, I put the document into the tools working group repository (trunk/working-groups/mpi-3/tools/MPI-3.1-toolsWG).

BTW: That's a repetitive and redundant directory name.  ;-)

--
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

_______________________________________________
mpiwg-tools mailing list
mpiwg-tools@lists.mpi-forum.org
http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-tools

_________________________________________________________________

Kathryn Mohror, kathryn@llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/
Scalability Team @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA

_______________________________________________
mpiwg-tools mailing list
mpiwg-tools@lists.mpi-forum.org
http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-tools