Hi all,
Thanks Dick and John for sending your use cases and straw men!
Here are a couple more docs I found from our discussions in the past:
Talk to you all soon!
Kathryn
From: mpiwg-tools <mpiwg-tools-bounces@lists.mpi-forum.org>
On Behalf Of Dirk Schubert via mpiwg-tools
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 3:43 AM
To: mpiwg-tools@lists.mpi-forum.org
Cc: Dirk Schubert <Dirk.Schubert@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [mpiwg-tools] Meeting March 21, 2019
Hi Kathryn,
The following use cases are important for Arm Forge (debugger DDT and profiler MAP).
Use case 1: Launch an MPI job under the control of a tool.
Input: The user's regular command line to start the MPI job, for example "mpirun -n 256 ./wave_c". Why? To make it as friction-less as possible to use a tool.
NB: The tool does not want to parse or interpret the MPI starter arguments, as the tool has no knowledge of all possible MPI starter arguments.
Requirements:
NB: Optional requirement = A tool could ultimately work without it, but I very much would like to see it supported.
In PMIx this is the “indirect” use case and Ralph Castain and I have been working together since a while to make sure this use case will be supported by PMIx (excluding some optional requirements for now).
Additional questions/notes:
Use case 2: Attach to a running MPI job with a tool.
This use case is a subset of use case 1 with the following requirements:
Thanks,
Dirk
From: mpiwg-tools <mpiwg-tools-bounces@lists.mpi-forum.org> on behalf of Mohror, Kathryn via mpiwg-tools <mpiwg-tools@lists.mpi-forum.org>
Sent: 17 March 2019 14:46
To: mpiwg-tools@lists.mpi-forum.org
Cc: Mohror, Kathryn
Subject: [mpiwg-tools] Meeting March 21, 2019
Hey everybody,
For our call this Thursday (3/21) we’ll come back to debugger topics again. The call is at the usual time in the US (8 am Pacific/ 11 am Eastern / 4 pm CET) but note that the US has moved to DST
but I don’t think the EU has done so yet.
Webex Info:
https://apps.fz-juelich.de/scalasca/mpiwg-tools-webex/index.php
Agenda:
In the last debugger call, I said that the plan for this meeting would be to get an overview of OMPD and start talking about analogous interfaces for MPI (e.g. revamp MQD). However, in the meantime,
I was convinced that we should focus on process acquisition first. So, the plan will be to talk about process acquisition in this meeting. I’ll go through our notes from 2017(ish) to hopefully find the straw men we drafted back then. Please bring your use
cases and any ideas you have on this front.
_________________________________________________________________
Kathryn Mohror,
kathryn@llnl.gov, https://people.llnl.gov/kathryn
Data Analysis Group @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person,
use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.