Hi Kathryn,
I attached the slides I presented to this group in January of 2017. They are the so-called, “What I did on my XMas vacation” slides that recap work I did (with a lot of help from Ralph) to learn how PMIx might interact with a tool like
TotalView. It also contains some thoughts about what the next generation of multi-process debugging interfaces might look like. Given the presentation’s age and the fact that I slapped it together, I think it’s fairly close to what’s needed, but should serve
only as a strawman.
Slide 5 has a rough breakdown of the “layers” a tool needs. Refining that a bit, I think the layers / APIs are:
Cheers, John D.
From: mpiwg-tools <mpiwg-tools-bounces@lists.mpi-forum.org>
On Behalf Of Mohror, Kathryn via mpiwg-tools
Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2019 10:47 AM
To: mpiwg-tools@lists.mpi-forum.org
Cc: Mohror, Kathryn <mohror1@llnl.gov>
Subject: [mpiwg-tools] Meeting March 21, 2019
Hey everybody,
For our call this Thursday (3/21) we’ll come back to debugger topics again. The call is at the usual time in the US (8 am Pacific/ 11 am Eastern / 4 pm CET) but note that the US has moved to DST but I don’t think the EU has done so yet.
Webex Info:
https://apps.fz-juelich.de/scalasca/mpiwg-tools-webex/index.php
Agenda:
In the last debugger call, I said that the plan for this meeting would be to get an overview of OMPD and start talking about analogous interfaces for MPI (e.g. revamp MQD). However, in the meantime, I was convinced that we should focus
on process acquisition first. So, the plan will be to talk about process acquisition in this meeting. I’ll go through our notes from 2017(ish) to hopefully find the straw men we drafted back then. Please bring your use cases and any ideas you have on this
front.
_________________________________________________________________
Kathryn Mohror, kathryn@llnl.gov,
https://people.llnl.gov/kathryn
Data Analysis Group @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA