Dear all, I'll be at a workshop on Monday, hence, it's not sure whether I can attend this meeting. Resonating with Dominik, I'd like to propose that we're working in the next months on writing down step-by-step the DPP approach in Latex as an
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Dear all,

I'll be at a workshop on Monday, hence, it's not sure whether I can attend this meeting.

Resonating with Dominik, I'd like to propose that we're working in the next months on writing down step-by-step the DPP approach in Latex as an extension to MPI, how it works, the rationality, etc.

We were working on this over the last years, had many discussions, finally also have an implementation, others also use it, etc. I think it's now time to try to get it into MPI.

In this way we'll structure things nicely, have some concrete discussion basis, etc.
Any feedback is appreciated.

@Howard, if you have some better idea, please let me know.

Cheers,

Martin



On 24.01.25 10:47, Dominik Huber via mpiwg-sessions wrote:
Hi Ralph, in this context, we are discussing a dynamic process approach based on PSets and PSet operations (see Additional PSET query/manipulation functions). The output of a PSet operation would be a list of PSet IDs that might refer to new
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd

Hi Ralph,


in this context, we are discussing a dynamic process approach based on PSets and PSet operations (see Additional PSET query/manipulation functions).

The output of a PSet operation would be a list of PSet IDs that might refer to new processes and can be used to create new MPI groups/communicators.


Regards,

Dominik

Von: mpiwg-sessions <mpiwg-sessions-bounces@lists.mpi-forum.org> im Auftrag von Ralph Castain via mpiwg-sessions <mpiwg-sessions@lists.mpi-forum.org>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. Januar 2025 19:03:06
An: Ralph Castain via mpiwg-sessions
Cc: Ralph Castain
Betreff: Re: [mpiwg-sessions] Topics for Sessions WG meeting 27th January 2025
 
Just curious - if you get rid of MPI_Comm_spawn, then how does one generate new processes? I assume some other API must replace it, so mostly wondering what that API is. FWIW: generating new processes without automatically connecting them to
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Just curious - if you get rid of MPI_Comm_spawn, then how does one generate new processes? I assume some other API must replace it, so mostly wondering what that API is.

FWIW: generating new processes without automatically connecting them to the parent seems like a reasonable thing to do, so long as you provide back some info (e.g., a group ID or namespace) that allows you to do it later if you so choose.

Ralph


On Jan 23, 2025, at 8:09 AM, Pritchard Jr., Howard via mpiwg-sessions <mpiwg-sessions@lists.mpi-forum.org> wrote:

This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
Hello Folks,
 
Let me know if you have topics to discuss at our next Sessions WG meeting on Monday 1/27/25.
 
I’ve attached some slides with ideas for discussion by the WG this calendar year.  We can discuss these at the meeting.
 
Thanks,
 
Howard
 
-------
 
<image001.png>
Howard Pritchard
Research Scientist
HPC-ENV
 
Los Alamos National Laboratory
 
 
 
<sessions_wg_01_27_24.pdf>_______________________________________________
mpiwg-sessions mailing list
mpiwg-sessions@lists.mpi-forum.org
https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-sessions


_______________________________________________
mpiwg-sessions mailing list
mpiwg-sessions@lists.mpi-forum.org
https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-sessions


-- 
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Martin Schreiber

Applied Mathematics | High Perf. Scientific Comp. for PDEs
Université Grenoble Alpes | Lab. Jean Kuntzmann | Inria | France