Hi Dan and others,
I'm through with my iteration & I'm up for other changes / suggestions
/ acceptance of my changes, etc.
I see two major discussion points:
* The slow/medium/fast changes where I wonder if this is the right
direction. I've tried to define this slightly different. Maybe this
could be also defined in terms of the success of coercive requests and
whether this is asynchronous or not. I'm not sure about this.
* Do we want to include fault tolerance? This would significantly
complicate things.
Cheers,
Martin
On Tue, 2021-03-30 at 19:12 +0100, Dan Holmes wrote:
Hi Martin (et al),
I just went through and added my tuppence throughout.
Cheers,
Dan.
—
Dr Daniel Holmes PhD
Executive Director
Chief Technology Officer
CHI Ltd
danholmes@chi.scot
On 29 Mar 2021, at 19:49, Schreiber, Martin via mpiwg-sessions
<mpiwg-sessions@lists.mpi-forum.org> wrote:
Hi all,
there's the document from Today:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1NLAMZtH5B3bVSnWk-ZxM9FhCJesZ92rL
For those not attending the meeting: We plan to extend this
document
and iterate over it to generate an API covering all important
aspects.
You're welcome anytime to add changes / comments (please with
tracking
of changes and using your real username). We very much appreciate
any
feedback.
Seems like it's public/bank holiday next week, so we meet again in
2
weeks.
Cheers,
Martin
--
Dr. Martin Schreiber
+49 (89) 289-17661
Technical University of Munich
Informatics 10: Computer Architecture and Parallel Systems
Boltzmannstrasse 3, Room 1.4.38
85748 Garching, Germany
_______________________________________________
mpiwg-sessions mailing list
mpiwg-sessions@lists.mpi-forum.org
https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-sessions
--
Dr. Martin Schreiber
+49 (89) 289-17661
Technical University of Munich
Informatics 10: Computer Architecture and Parallel Systems
Boltzmannstrasse 3, Room 1.4.38
85748 Garching, Germany