Hi Howard (et al),
I wrote down my thoughts on #710 (including the sessions viewpoint) here:
https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/710#issuecomment-1536306552
Addendum, just for sessions folks:
``` C
MPI_Init();
MPI_Recv_init(…, MPI_COMM_WORLD, &req);
MPI_Finalize();
MPI_Request_free(&req); // erroneous, MPI is no longer initialised, so calling MPI_Request_free is prohibited
MPI_Session_init();
MPI_Request_free(&req); // oh dear lord, what is this? Surely this is also erroneous, but where …flicks through the MPI Standard… is the prohibition in the standard?
MPI_Session_finalize();
```
Best wishes,
Dan.
From: mpiwg-sessions <mpiwg-sessions-bounces@lists.mpi-forum.org>
On Behalf Of Pritchard Jr., Howard via mpiwg-sessions
Sent: 04 May 2023 23:46
To: MPI Sessions working group <mpiwg-sessions@lists.mpi-forum.org>
Cc: Pritchard Jr., Howard <howardp@lanl.gov>
Subject: [mpiwg-sessions] Agenda items for Sessions WG meeting - 5/8/23
Hi All,
Please send me agenda items you’d like to discuss at our WG meeting on 5/8/23.
I have one item already. I’d like to discuss
https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/710 and its possible impact on sessions.
Howard
—
