Rolf might like that, but there's really no reason for the title to include MPI-3.0 errata. If we want another selector, that makes sense, but having it in the title just burns good screen real estate� Brian On 1/28/13 2:23 PM, "Jim Dinan" <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Pavan,

Could you please log these as tickets, so we don't lose any items. Please include the exact change, if it's ready. Also, Rolf would like us to use the the following formatting for title/ticket type:

Title: MPI-3.0 errata: xxxxxxxxxxx Type: Correction to standard (for upcoming release + errata)

Thanks, ~Jim.

On 1/28/13 2:33 PM, Pavan Balaji wrote:

...

Jim,

We talked about a few things in the last Forum. Slides are online on the Forum page. I also sent an email about it after the Forum; I can try to dig it up if you can't find it.

-- Pavan

On 01/28/2013 09:54 AM US Central Time, Jim Dinan wrote:

...

Hi All,

We are assembling the list of RMA errata to be voted on at the March meeting. Currently, we have tickets #347, #348, #350, and #355 (I'm working on official wording for these changes and will circulate it soon).

Are there any other errata items that should be included on the agenda for the upcoming meeting?

Thanks, ~Jim. _______________________________________________ mpi3-rma mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-rma

_______________________________________________ mpi3-rma mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-rma

-- Brian W. Barrett Scalable System Software Group Sandia National Laboratories