On 06/21/2010 12:05 AM, William Gropp wrote:

Note that in this interpretation, proposal 1 is not a "bare minimum"; rather, it is a consensus collection of consistent extensions that enlarge the space of applications that can be efficiently coded using MPI-3 one-sided. It will leave some useful features out and some

I agree with this definition, and this is along the lines of what I was proposing -- a set of features that we have a consensus on, rather the "minimum set of features" each one of us thinks should be in. -- Pavan -- Pavan Balaji http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji