Re: [Mpi3-rma] Alternative Proposal for Shared Memory Support
I assumed the epoch was not needed :-). Rajeev On Mar 16, 2011, at 8:42 AM, Torsten Hoefler wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 08:22:05AM -0500, James Dinan wrote:
Hi Rajeev,
Why not use lock/unlock? Lock_all seems like a good fit here. Yes, I omitted the epoch (like Rajeev did in his example). I assumed lock/unlock (all).
Torsten
-- bash$ :(){ :|:&};: --------------------- http://www.unixer.de/ ----- Torsten Hoefler | Performance Modeling and Simulation Lead Blue Waters Directorate | University of Illinois (UIUC) 1205 W Clark Street | Urbana, IL, 61801 NCSA Building | +01 (217) 244-7736 _______________________________________________ mpi3-rma mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-rma
participants (1)
-
Rajeev Thakur