Hi Bill, #363 - Closed as withdrawn #366 - Closed as withdrawn #401 - It would be nice to add this as errata in MPI 3.1, if the WG can reach agreement on text in time #439 - Queued up for WG discussion as an MPI 4.0 proposal. Torsten has a competing proposal that does not have a ticket registered in Trac. I added a link to his slides on #439. #460 - Not on your list. This is a proposal for a new info key that was suggested by a user. Should be queued up for WG discussion. ~Jim. On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:19 AM, William Gropp <[email protected]> wrote:

I looked through all of the tickets and wrote a summary of the open issues, which I’ve attached. I propose the following:

Determine which of these issues can be resolved by email. A significant number can probably be closed with no further action.

For those requiring rework, determine if there is still interest in them, and if not, close them as well.

For the ones requiring discussion, assign someone to organize a position and discussion. We can schedule telecons to go over those issues. The first item in the list is certainly in this class.

Comments?

Bill

_______________________________________________ mpiwg-rma mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-rma