can you elaborate? why does one want this? to figure out what atomicity should be used in load-store access? what's the harm in adding it? thanks. jeff On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Torsten Hoefler <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi group,

Hubert just brought this up at the ticket. It's a valid point but may be a bit late. Unfortunately, we're far away from a quorum at the Forum (we have only Sreeram and me in the room). So I am broadcasting the question to the mailinglist.

Any opinions? I'd vote to add it also (as part of yesterday's change).

Thanks, Torsten

-- ### qreharg rug ebs fv crryF ------------- http://www.unixer.de/ ----- Torsten Hoefler | Performance Modeling and Simulation Lead Blue Waters Directorate | University of Illinois (UIUC) 1205 W Clark Street | Urbana, IL, 61801 NCSA Building | +01 (217) 244-7736 _______________________________________________ mpi3-rma mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-rma

-- Jeff Hammond Argonne Leadership Computing Facility University of Chicago Computation Institute [email protected] / (630) 252-5381 http://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffhammond https://wiki.alcf.anl.gov/parts/index.php/User:Jhammond