Re: [Mpi3-rma] RMA proposal 1 update
25 May
2010
25 May
'10
10:35 a.m.
1) We didn't straw-vote on MPI_Accumulate_get, so this function might go. The removal would be very clean.
I'm with Rajeev on this one. I don't see the point. But, I think you knew that already ;-)
2) Should we allow MPI_NOOP in MPI_Accumulate (this does not make sense and is incorrect in my current proposal)
Agreed - it doesn't make sense to me either.
3) Should we allow MPI_REPLACE in MPI_Get_accumulate/MPI_Accumulate_get? (this would make sense and is allowed in the current proposal but we didn't talk about it in the group)
Yes, we should allow MPI_REPLACE - where else do we get a plain swap instead of a compare-and-swap? Keith
5906
Age (days ago)
5906
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Underwood, Keith D