OK, thanks - will do. Martin On Jan 13, 2013, at 3:09 PM, Jim Dinan wrote:

Hi Martin,

I don't currently have an estimate, but I think it would make sense to set aside an hour of plenary time to work through RMA errata.

~Jim.

On 1/11/13 1:10 PM, Schulz, Martin wrote:

...

Hi Jim,

On Jan 9, 2013, at 12:03 PM, Jim Dinan wrote:

...

Hi Rolf,

I updated tickets 347, 348, 350, and 355 to errata. The RMA WG will prepare these for passage at the March meeting.

Do you have an estimate of how much time you want for this? Do you expect any large discussions?

Thanks,

Martin

...

~Jim.

On 1/9/13 4:00 AM, Rolf Rabenseifner wrote:

...

Jim and all,

I expect that you may want to handle the tickets #347, #348, #350, and #355 as MPI-3.0 errata.

For this, the most simplest is to add "MPI-3.0 Errata:" at the beginning of your ticket title. I did this in #345. It passed at the Dec. 2012 meeting.

You should pass such errata as fast as possible, probably in the next meeting.

I do not know whether ticket #346 is an errata (i.e., clarification or correction of a wrong, inconsistent or missing definition) or a new feature.

As usual at the end, I'll put all the errata in a separate section in MPI-next, as I did in MPI-3.0 B.1.1. Therefore I prefer to have such a clean visibility in the title. The method we used in MPI-3.0 was too dangerous (we oversaw them for an extremely long time).

Best regards Rolf

________________________________________________________________________ Martin Schulz, [email protected], http://people.llnl.gov/schulzm CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA

________________________________________________________________________ Martin Schulz, [email protected], http://people.llnl.gov/schulzm CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA